Discussion

Explanation:

Assuming,

Case 1: Harsh is the truth-teller i.e., both his statements are correct.

∴ Harsh is the mechanic, Akash is liar and Raju is alternator.

Checking for statements of Akash (liar): His both statements are false, which fits well with our assumption.

Checking for statements of Raju (alternator): His both statements are false, which contradicts our assumption.

∴ Harsh cannot be the truth-teller.

Case 2: Akash is the truth-teller i.e., both his statements are correct.

∴ Akash is the mechanic, Raju is liar and Harsh is alternator.

Checking for statements of Raju (liar): His first statement is true which contradicts our assumption.

∴ Akash cannot be the truth-teller.

Case 3: Raju is the truth-teller i.e., both his statements are correct.

∴ Akash is the mechanic, Harsh is liar and Akash is alternator.

Checking for statements of Harsh (liar): His both statement are false, which fits well with our assumption.

Checking for statements of Akash (alternator): His first statement is true and second statement is false, which fits well with our assumption

∴ Akash is the mechanic.

Hence, option (b).

» Your doubt will be displayed only after approval.


Doubts


Feedback

Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.


© 2024 | All Rights Reserved | Apti4All