XAT 2016 DM | Previous Year XAT Paper
XAT 2016 Decision Making
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
Kamal Chinnappa, Vimal Rao, Ganesh Krishnan and Dines Kumar own a saloon each on the Barbil street. They are the only hairdressers on that street. Each of them offered three services viz. haircut, shaving and hair-dye. One evening, all four of them met in a nearby tea-stall and agreed to charge Rs. 100 for any of the three services (haircut, shave and hair-dye) on weekdays. They also agreed to increase this rate to Rs. 115 on weekends and holidays. All verbally decided to implement the agreement.
The following day Kamal, being the most competent hairdresser on the street, was contemplating charging higher than agreed upon price.
Which of the following would enable him to charge more with minimal violation of the agreement?
- A.
He should introduce a new and specialized service at Rs. 130.
- B.
He should open another shop on the same street and charge Rs. 150.
- C.
He should charge Rs. 130 for those wanting to jump the queue.
- D.
He should charge Rs. 115 for a service to a particular customer and give the next service free.
- E.
He should open his shop two hours before others and close it two hours after.
Answer: Option A
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
This move will break the agreement to a larger extent and can be eliminated.
This move would be unfair for other customers and also by charging Rs130 Kamal would be violating the agreement. So, eliminate option 3.
This move will lead to violation of the agreement as Kamal cannot charge more than Rs 100 for agreed upon services as part of the contract. So, eliminate option 4.
Flexible shop timings does not ensure greater profits and thus this option can be eliminated.
Option 1 is the best option as introducing a new service would be a minimal violation as the other hairdressers were providing only three services and charging Rs 130 for that service would not cause any violation as Rs 100 charge pertained to those three services only.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
Vimal relies heavily on a bunch of loyal customers. He is concerned about retaining them.
Which of the following options should he chose if he does not want to violate the agreement?
- A.
He should charge differential rates for loyal customers.
- B.
He should charge the loyal customers lower.
- C.
He should make every third visit free for his loyal customers.
- D.
He should charge all the agreed upon price.
- E.
He should allow his loyal customers to jump the queue.
Answer: Option E
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
The question clearly says that there should be no violation, hence even minimum violation has to be avoided.
Charging differential rates is a clear violation of the agreement and can be ruled out immediately.
Option 2 can be ruled out along the same lines as option 1 as charging lower is also a violation.
Option 3 is also a violation as providing service free of charge was not the part of the agreement.
Option 4 will not help Vimal in his attempt to retain his loyal customers. So, eliminate option 4.
Option 5 is the most suitable course of action as a privilege of this kind would definitely help him sustain the trust of his loyal customers. Also, there won't be any violation in terms of agreed upon rates.
Hence, the correct answer is option 5.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
Chatterjee, the MLA of Trikathapur, owes his election success to his close friend and businessman Ghosh. The victory had appeared unlikely for Chatterjee after the arrival of Bhowmick, a budding politician with hordes of money. However, his clean image along with Ghosh’s money ensured Chatterjee’s resounding victory.
After the elections, Ghosh requested Chatterjee to sanction the land adjoining his factory, for expansion. However, the requested government land was a green belt reducing harmful pollution from the factory.
Which of the following is the BEST option for Chatterjee in these circumstances?
- A.
Chatterjee should approve the sale only aftter Ghosh plants a large number of trees around the factory and the city.
- B.
Chatterjee should oblige Ghosh provided he recruits 20 locals as his employees on condition that they plant and maintain a tree each in their locality.
- C.
As Ghosh is paying market rates Chatterjee should approve the sale with no rides.
- D.
Chatterjee should approve the sale and ensure that the green belt is shifted ta a different tract of land outside the city, purchased from the proceeds of the sale.
- E.
Chatterjee should unconditionally approve the transfer of the land to Ghosh as a token of gratitude.
Answer: Option A
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Option 1 is a rational move as approving the sale on a condition that ensures restoration of the green belt in the same locality will prove to be fair for everyone.
20 locals planting 20 trees is not going to compensate for the pollution control performed by green belt. So, eliminate option 2.
Option 3 is extreme and can very well be avoided as it does not ensure no harm to the environment.
So, eliminate option 3.
Option 4 is sidetracks the issue of the location of the green belt being in the midst of the city. So, eliminate option 4.
Option 5 is not only far-fetched but also erroneous.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
Inspired by Bhowmick’s manifesto, Chatterjee is contemplating a green policy which can adversely affect Ghosh’s business interest.
Which of the following actions from Ghosh is likely to convince Chatterjee NOT to pursue this policy?
- A.
Request Chatterjee to defer implementation of the green policy by 3 years, the time needed to make his factory green.
- B.
Remind Chatterjee that it is for his clean image that people voted him and not for Bhowmick’s green policy.
- C.
Warn Chatterjee that all industrialists will turn against him and despite his clean image he may be hated by the industry.
- D.
Appeal to Chatterjee’s sympathy citing the potential loss his business will suffer if the policy were to be implemented.
- E.
Threaten Chatterjee that he should not take his loyalty for granted as Bhowmick has invited him to join his party.
Answer: Option B
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Deferring the implementation of green policy will not convince Chatterjee to completely eliminate the thought of this plan. Hence, this option bypasses the crux of the question. So, eliminate option 1.
Warnings or threats will only lead to a bitter and broken relation between Chatterjee and Ghosh, and pursuing either methods should be avoided. So, eliminate options 3 and 5.
Given the pivotal role of Ghosh in Chatterjee's victory, it would be dishonorable for Ghosh to appeal to Chatterjee's sympathy. So, eliminate option 4.
Option 2 is an apt move as it is imperative for Chatterjee to realize that he is being influenced by Bhowmick's green policy and this attitude of his will only ruin his clean image that had garnered him votes. A friendly advice is what is needed in this situation.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
The City of Yashmund served by licensed taxis operating on officially sanctioned metered rates and driven by licensed drivers who do not own the taxis but pay a monthly rent to the taxi-owners. Shailesh Nair, the mayor of Yashmund, perceived that most of these taxis do not offer sufficient comfort and safety to passengers.
The Mayor wants the owners and drivers to care about comfort.
Which of the following decisions, IF TAKEN, is MOST LIKELY to increase the comfort levels of passengers?
- A.
The mayor issues a guideline that taxis will be randomly inspected by the police for the comfort level.
- B.
The mayor ensures banks grant drivers loans to own cars. Owner driven cars generally offer greater comfort.
- C.
The mayor introduces licensing of air-conditioned taxis which can charge increased rates to the rich customers.
- D.
The mayor introduces a feedback system that records passenger satisfaction with comfort levels; this will affect renewal of annual taxi license
- E.
The mayor permits doubling metered rates which will ensure enhanced income for owners to invest in greater comfort.
Answer: Option D
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
A random inspection is likely to miss out on the ones which do not offer comfort to their passengers. So, eliminate option 1.
Option 2 is unethical as it would render the taxi drivers unemployed. So, eliminate option 2.
Option 3 is skewed towards affluent lot and does not address the concern of the Mayor who wants comfort and safety of all passengers. So, eliminate option 3.
Charging extra in exchange for comfort is not a feasible solution as the Mayor wants the taxi owners to offer sufficient comfort without any increase in rates. Charging extra would cause discomfort to the customers and will not serve the purpose. So, eliminate option 5.
Option 4 is the best solution as individual feedback from passengers would help and improve the comfort level of passengers and also feedback affecting the renewal of taxi license would ensure active participation from all taxi drivers.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
The mayor wants to involve the car owners in finding a solution to the problem of comfort and safety. He is concerned that the customers may not be willing to pay more for safety.
Which of the options below is MOST LIKELY to convince the owners?
- A.
The taxi owners who clear comfort-inspection can charge higher rentals from the drivers and drivers with impeccable safety record can charge the same from customers
- B.
The taxis that clear comfort-inspection can charge 25% above the metered rates; studies have shown that customers are willing to pay around 18% extra for comfort.
- C.
If a taxis owner has a consistent record of comfort and safety the government will subsidize a second loan.
- D.
Taxis can charge 25% more if they clear comfort-inspection. However, owners of the taxis found compromising on safety will be jailed.
- E.
Taxis that pass comfort-inspection test can charge 25% more. Should they violate any traffic rule this privilege would be withdrawn.
Answer: Option D
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
According to the information provided, the customers may not be willing to pay more for safety which leaves open the possibility of charging more from them for comfort. If the taxi owners are allowed to charge more for comfort, they should be strictly supervised for the safety factor. This way, both the elements of concern of the Mayor are taken care of, along with cooperation from the taxi owners.
Only option 4 resonates this arrangement.
In option 1, safety and comfort are bifurcated into two segments one containing the owner and another containing the taxi driver, whereas the Mayor needs the cooperation of the taxi owners. Hence, eliminate option 1.
Option 2 does not take the safety factor into consideration. So, eliminate option 2.
Option 3 isn't lucrative enough to get the taxi owners on board with the Mayor's offer. So, eliminate option 3.
Option 5 is ambiguous with its mention of traffic rules. So, eliminate option 5.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
Indian Institute of Research is a Government-established body to promote research. In addition to helping in policy making, it also provides free online access to all the articles to the public. It has a mission of publishing high quality research articles. Till 2010, the publication of articles was very slow because there was no incentive for researchers to publish. Researchers stuck to the mandatory one article a year. Most of the researchers engaged in offering consultancy and earned extra income. Since its inception, the institute was considered the best place for cutting edge research. The new director of the institute was not happy with the work done by researchers in silo and came out with a new research policy in 2013 to increase research output and improve collaboration among researchers. It was decided that extra benefits would be offered to researchers with new publications. As a result, the number of research articles increased fourfold in 2014. At the 2015 annual audit, an objection was raised against increased expenses towards remuneration for researchers. Further, the Government opined that the publication was itself a reward and hence researchers need be paid nothing extra. The director tried to defend his policy but the response from the government was not encouraging.
l. Note: Auditors role is to verify accounts.
The following facts were observed by an analytics team hired by the government to study the extant situation.
- There was a four-fold increase in the number of researchers leaving the organization in 2014.
- A researcher died while on duty.
- The quality of articles published declined substantially.
- The average number of people accessing an article decreased by 2%.
Which of the following options would justify the government’s intention to DISCONTINUE the scheme?
- A.
1 and 2
- B.
2 and 3
- C.
3 only
- D.
4 only
- E.
3 and 4
Answer: Option C
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Discontinuing the scheme because a large number of researchers were leaving the organization is not a valid point as it does not account for the researchers still working in the organisation. Hence, one cannot assume the sole reason of
A researcher's death while on duty is open to many interpretations and is not remotely related to the government's decision to discontinue the scheme. So, eliminate option 2.
2% is too low a statistic to factor in in the decision making process. So, eliminate option 4.
Option 3 is the only logical justification as the remuneration would not have put to proper use if the quality of the articles declined. Hence, the scheme is not improving the condition of the organisation substantially and needs to be discontinued.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
The director still wanted to persuade the government to review its stand. He had framed the following arguments:
- Most famous researchers in the world are also the highest paid.
- American institute of research gives extra benefits to its scientists.
- This year’s highest paid researcher had won the Noble Prize last year.
Considering the Government to be reasonable which of the following options is UNLIKELY to convince the government?
- A.
1 and 2
- B.
2 only
- C.
2 and 3
- D.
1 and 3
- E.
1, 2 and 3
Answer: Option E
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
None of the arguments touches upon the quality of the publications of the researches, which is the crux of the main argument raised in the passage and not merely the researchers and their income.
So, the correct answer is option 5.
Workspace:
The director wanted to promote good decision making at Indian Institute of Research. A few trusted colleagues offered the following suggestions:
- Auditors need not be allowed to object to extra benefits schemes.
- Auditors need not pin-point sudden increase in expenditure
- Auditors need not be consulted before taking any policy level decision.
Which of the following combination of options should the director agree THE MOST with?
- A.
1 and 2
- B.
2 only
- C.
2 and 3
- D.
1 and 3
- E.
1, 2 and 3
Answer: Option D
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
According to the passage, the role of an auditor is to verify accounts. Hence, we can infer that an auditor's role is confined to supervising the expenses of the organization. Therefore, auditors should not have a say in the extra benefits scheme of the organisation and in other decision making processes.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
Purushottam Bhatnagar own and operates a sweetshop Puru and Sons. He is about 60 years old is eager to hand over the business to his sons Ratan and Pramod. He however, fears that his sons, fresh from college may not understand the tricks of the trade.
Purushottam sends a batch of sweets to the police station across the street every day. Ratan constructed it as a bribe and wanted to stop this practice.
Which of the following arguments, IF TRUE, would BEST convince Ratan NOT to given up this practice?
- A.
In the last three years, three attempts to burgle Puru and Sons were effectively foiled by the police.
- B.
Each policeman receives only two piece of sweet, too small to be considered a bribe.
- C.
The police in return send two policemen in mufti to mingle with the customers during rush hours to prevent pickpockets.
- D.
Every day, Purushottam also sends a batch of sweets to the school next to the station, an orphanage nearby and the temple at the end of the street.
- E.
Purushottam’s competitor Uttampurush who runs a sweetshop in the same street and his neighbor Mahapurush who runs a samosa stall, both do similar things every day.
Answer: Option D
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Options 1 and 3 show that the Police is paying off the debt of free sweets by mitigating the burglary taking place at Purushottam's shop. Hence, it implicitly indicates bribery and cannot be considered for convincing Ratan. So, eliminate options 1 and 3.
Option 2 is not a strong argument as it does not entirely rule out the possibility of the sweets being a bribery. So, eliminate option 2.
Option 5 brings forth a competitive aspect of Purushottam's action which is uncalled for in the present scenario. So, eliminate option 5.
Option 4 completely rules out the possibility of bribing the policemen as the same offering is sent to a school, an orphanage and a temple. Hence, the batch of sweets can be considered as a sweet gesture from Purushottam to people in general.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
Purushottam’s eldest son discovered that the shop repackaged sweets that were close to expiry and sold them at a discount under different names. These sweets usually get sold very fast. But his son was concerned about the possible consequences of this practice.
Purushottam was thiking of the following arguments to convince his son.
- These sweets are consumed the same day and therefore there is no cause for worry.
- Reduced prices give enough indication about the sweets to the customers.
- These products are preferred by those who cannot afford full price and in a way, this is a service done to them.
- In the past 30 years not a single person has reported ill because of consumption of these sweets.
- Repacking and selling sweets is a common practice.
Which combination of arguments below is MOST LIKELY to convince Ratan?
- A.
1 and 3
- B.
1 and 4
- C.
2 and 3
- D.
2 and 5
- E.
4 and 5
Answer: Option B
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Option 1 is a strong argument as the sweets are close to expiry and there is no harm in consuming them immediately.
Option 2 is unethical on the part of Purushottam as he tries to put the entire responsibility on the shoulders of the customers. So, eliminate option 2.
Option 3 is unethical as offering sweets close to expiry at a low cost does not rule out the possibility of the customers falling sick due to its consumption. So, eliminate option 3.
Option 4 gives a concrete evidence in order to justify this practice and a clean history reduces the probability of negative consequences to a greater extent.
Option 5 is passive in nature and can be eliminated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
Purushottam’s younger son Pramod discovered that 10% of their customers whom Purushottam called privileged customers purchased sweets at prices fixed 10 years ago (which is significantly lower than the current prices). Purushottam told him, “This 10% are my core and loyal customers with whom I have personal connect and therefore they deserve this privilege”. Pramod refuted his father’s argument citing the following information.
- These customers from the top 20% of the income bracket of the city.
- These customers frequently purchase from other sweetshops at market prices.
- None of them recognizes and greets Purushottam at the shop or at anywhere else.
- None of them was present at Pramod’s marriage.
- These customers actually buy sweets at Puru and sons for others not part of the core and loyal customer group.
Which of the following combination of the above will MOST LIKELY convince Purushottam to change market price to all?
- A.
1 and 2
- B.
2 and 4
- C.
2 and 5
- D.
3 and 4
- E.
4 and 5
Answer: Option C
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Since Purushottam has already given an explanation for charging lower price to the privileged customers, the data on their income will not impact his decision. So, eliminate option 1.
Option 2 questions the loyalty of his privileged customers which was the sole reason for Purushottam to follow this practice. Hence, it is a strong argument.
Options 3 and 4 seem incongruous with respect to the information provided in the passage. So, eliminate options 3 and 4.
Option 5 indicates betrayal on the part of his loyal customers and hence Purushottam should not provide them with concessional rates.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
Nicky, Manoj and Benita are graduates from a top ranked B-school. They joined ABC corporation a year ago. ABC is known for its performance oriented culture. This is the first time the organization recruited from a top ranked B-school. They are part of a five member team with two others from lower ranked B-schools. Nicky, Manoj and Benita draw 40 percent higher salaries than other team members. This team reports to Amelia Ganeshmurthi, a senior executive.
Amelia is disappointed with the performance of Nicky, Manoj and Benita. She came to know that ABC was not their first choice and they had spent the first ten months applying to other organizations. However, they have now started liking ABC and promised to do their best henceforth. Amelia has to rate their annual performance and decide about their future. She has the following choices:
- Fire them from ABC for insincerity and save the organization’s time and money.
- Given them average ratings with a year to prove their worth and fire them from ABC if they fail to show significant progress.
- Impose a pay-cut of 15% since they have not delivered on the promise, but give them relatively high ratings.
- Given them relatively poor ratings with one year time to improve and fire them from ABC if they fail to show significant progress.
- Give them high ratings and give them a second chance to prove their worth.
Which of the following options rank the above choices in the order of MOST APPROPRIATE to LEAST APPROPRIATE?
- A.
1, 2, 3
- B.
2, 1, 4
- C.
4, 2, 5
- D.
4, 3, 1
- E.
5, 2, 3
Answer: Option C
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Option 1 is a harsh course of action and is likely to spoil the career of the three students.
Option 3 is unfair on the part of authorities to give high ratings to poorly performing candidates.
Option 4 is the most appropriate course of action as it gives a second chance to the three students and would not jeopardize their career.
The next best move would be giving them average ratings and a year to prove their worth before firing them. Hence, 4 and 2 in a logical order is only presented by option 3.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Recruiting Nicky, Manoj and Benita was part of a larger initiative to make the organization attractive to prospective employees. Recently Amelia’s boss informally told her that the trio’s perception of the organization might influence future recruitment from top B-schools. However, the trio had already expressed their unhappiness about the organization to Amelia. She suspected that her promotion due next year might depend on the trio!
Which of the following is the BEST way for Amelia to deal with this situation?
- A.
Henceforth, she should be lenient with the trio.
- B.
She should promise the trio an early promotion if they can help her recruit good talent from top B-schools,
- C.
Henceforth, she should occasionally invite the trio for dinner and informal outings.
- D.
She should tell her boss that it is unfair to link her promotion to the trio’s behavior.
- E.
She should convey the trio’s unhappiness to her boss.
Answer: Option E
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
The trio's unhappiness has not been explicitly mentioned as one cannot be sure about the behaviour of Amelia towards the trio. So, eliminate option 1.
Option 2 is an implied bribery and is unethical on the part of Amelia. So, eliminate option 2.
Option 3 is unprofessional in nature and does not do anything to help solve the problem of Amelia's boss. So, eliminate option 3.
Option 4 will be selfish on the part of Amelia to look out for herself in such complicated situation.
Option 5 puts forth a viable solution for all the people involved.
Hence, the correct answer is option 5.
Workspace:
Nicky’s performance on the job is disappointing though she is considered a very helpful person outside the workplace helping her teammates and others in the organization with their personal needs e.g. finding a place to rent, a good place to get homely food etc. On the other hand, Manoj and Benita are performing well in their respective jobs and are perceived by their teammates as important to the team. But they are not interested in helping outside the workplace. Amelia has to decide the future of the trio. She has the following options:
- A.
Inform the higher authorities about Nicky’s poor performance and ask them to take a call.
- B.
Send Nicky for a one month training earmarked for top performing employees.
- C.
Serve Nicky an ultimatum to improve within the next six months or get fired.
- D.
Even though they performed well, give Manoj and Benita average ratings because of their disinterest in helping outside workplace.
- E.
Give Manoj and Benita high ratings based on their performance.
Answer: Option E
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Option 1 does not take into consideration Nicky's side of story and releases Amelia from Nicky's responsibility. So, eliminate option 1.
Option 2 is not an appropriate course of action as sending Nicky for a training earmarked for top performing employees will encourage Nicky's ignorance towards her work responsibilities.
Option 3 is a logical step as it would put Nicky under the radar and compel her to focus on work only.
Option 4 will simply discourage Manoj and Benita from performing well at work and will indirectly affect the organisation.
Option 5 is a fair course of action.
Hence, the correct answer is option 5.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
Six people working at the Bengaluru office of Simsys are planning to buy flats at a real estate project at Whitefield. Their prederences are listed below:
They have identified 7 real estate projects with following facilities available (marked with √):
A person is ‘satisfied’ if a project meets all three preferences.
Identify the project(s) where NONE of the 6 persons will be ‘satisfied’.
- A.
M only
- B.
N only
- C.
P only
- D.
N and P only
- E.
In all projects at least one person will be ‘satisfied’.
Answer: Option C
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
In this question, if even one person is satisfied then the project will be disregarded.
For project N, we can see that Yadav will be satisfied. Hence, options B, D, E are eliminated.
For project P, we can see that there is no recreation club, no ground floor flat, distance to office is greater than 15 km and the price is 65-80 Lacs. Therefore, all 6 people will be unsatisfied.
Hence, option (c).
Workspace:
Identify the project(s), where AT LEAST 3 of the persons will be ‘satisfied’.
- A.
M only
- B.
S only
- C.
Q and R only
- D.
M, Q and S only
- E.
M, Q and R only
Answer: Option D
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
In this question, if a project has more than 3 unsatisfied people then that project is disregarded.
In project R, we can see that Patel, Khan and Lingdo will be unsatisfied since there is no recreation club. This eliminates option 3 and 5
In project M, Bhatia, Yadav and Singh will be the only people unsatisfied on the criteria of Price. Therefore, this project is considered.
In project S, Bhatia will be the only person unsatisfied on the criteria of distance to mall. Therefore, this project is considered.
The only option with M and S both present is option 4.
Hence, option (d).
Workspace:
The marketing managers of all the six projects have agreed to add a recreation club and a car parking facility to the projects. In this changed scenario identify projects where AT MOST 2 of the 6 persons will NOT be ‘satisfied’.
- A.
N,Q and R only
- B.
P only
- C.
M and P only
- D.
N and P only
- E.
M, N and P only
Answer: Option A
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
In this question, if more than 2 persons are not satisfied then the project is disregarded else it is considered.
In project P, Bhatia, Yadav and Singh will be unsatisfied on the criteria of price. Therefore, this project is disregarded.
This eliminates all the options except 1.
Hence, option (a).
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
Recently a private food testing agency reported the presence of a harmful chemical in Crunchy Chips, a product of a fast moving consumer goods giant. The report sparked a nationwide outcry.
Rajan Shekhawat, the CEO of the company, feared this incident might affect the company’s image among consumers. Rajan had the following options:
- Apologizing publicly for this inconvenience and immediately withdrawing the products from all stores.
- Communicate ‘the correct findings’ to the public.
- Hire a reputed independent testing agency to verify the claims of the report.
- Establish internal mechanisms to prevent repetition of such incidences in future.
- Give higher incentives to distributors and retailers for selling the company brands.
Which of the following would be the MOST APPROPRIATE ORDER of options for Rajan, starting from the immediate?
- A.
3, 1, 5
- B.
3, 2, 4
- C.
1, 3, 5
- D.
1, 2, 5
- E.
5, 3, 2
Answer: Option B
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Option 5 is the most unethical course of action as it encourages selling adulterated product to the consumers and harming their health.
Option 1 is a hasty course of action as the company should dig deep into the issue and find out the truth.
Of the three options, option 3 is the foremost step in finding the truth behind this accusation in a bid to clear company's name. Chronologically, option 2 should be the next step in order to be transparent with the customers to gain their trust. Finally, the company should ensure that such incidents don't repeat in future.
Hence, the correct sequence is 3,2,4.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
Mukesh Routray, a shopkeeper in a remote village was surprised to read in the newspaper, his only source of information, about harmful chemicals in Crunchy Chips. He had stocked a large quantity of Crunchy Chips for the forthcoming festive season. He also realized that people in his village are completely unaware of this controversy. He had the following options:
- Sell the entire stock at a discount before the news spreads.
- Destroy the entire stock and advise customers not to buy ths product from other shops as well.
- Donate the entire stock of Crunchy Chips to a local orphanage.
- Inform customers about the controversy but understate its seriousness.
- Ignore the news and sell the stock at the forthcoming festive season as planned.
- Explore the veracity of the report and then take decision
If arranged from ethical to unethical which of the following is DEFINITELY the WRONG order?
- A.
6, 5, 1
- B.
6, 1, 4
- C.
4, 5, 1
- D.
2, 4, 3
- E.
2, 4, 1
Answer: Option B
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
The question here asks for a definite wrong order and hence the sequence with an illogical order gives the answer to this question.
The sequence 6,1,4 is an improper sequence when arranged from ethical to unethical as the entire sequence appears absurd. Despite exploring the veracity of the report, selling the stock at a discounted rate before the spread of the news will completely mislead the innocent customers. Moreover, after selling them the stock, informing the customers about the controversy will not only rob them off their money but also break their trust in the shopkeeper. Hence, the order is totally irrational.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
An independent and trustworthy confidante of Rajan Shekhawat, the CEO of the company, informed him that one of their main competitors had bribed the food testing agency to manipulate the report.
Which of the following actions will BEST help Crunchy Chips to bounce back?
- A.
Proclaim over the media that their product is completely safe.
- B.
Secretly hire a food testing agency to ascertain the quality of the competitor’s product.
- C.
Hire another food testing agency to test and communicate the outcome to the consumers.
- D.
File a defamation case against the competitor for their alleged involvement in the conspiracy
- E.
File a defamation case against the food testing agency.
Answer: Option E
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
In this scenario, the real culprit is the food testing agency who willingly accepted the bribe and should be the one to receive the punishment. Hence, filing a case against the competitor or any other action against the competitor is uncalled for at this stage. So, eliminate option 2 and 4.
Option 1 would shift the focus from exposing the main culprit which should be the foremost step in this case. So, eliminate option 1.
Involving another food testing agency would unnecessarily confuse the consumers and does nothing to help the company bounce back. Hence, eliminate options 3.
Hence, the correct answer is option 5.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
Geetha Gawde can cultivate up to 6 crops a year. Crop A and B are ready for harvest in 2 months; crop C and D in 3 months, and crop E and F in 4 months. Crop A can be cultivated from January to June; crop B can be cultivated from April to September; crop C can be cultivated from May to December; crops D as well as E can be cultivated from August to December, and crop F from November to May. If Geetha plans a change of crop the soil should be left fallow for one month; however, if the same crop is sown no fallow time is needed. Sowing takes place only at the beginning of a month. Geetha can only harvest a maximum of 1000 units of any crop at any point in time. The production cost per unit (incurred at the time of sowing) and price per unit of crop are as follows:
For Geetha soil preparation does not incur any cost. If a crop is abandoned before the scheduled harvesting, she gets no money. Geetha is preparing a cropping schedule to maximize her annual profits (i.e. price – cost). She plans to replicate the schedule in the coming years.
Which of the following would DEFINITELY be a part of the ideal schedule?
- A.
Cultivate crop B in August or September.
- B.
Cultivate crop B from April to September.
- C.
Do not cultivate any crop in August but cultivate crop D in September.
- D.
Cultivate crop D or crop E in August or September.
- E.
Do not cultivate any crop in August; but cultivate crop D or crop E in September.
Answer: Option C
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
E cannot be cultivated from September to December as A cannot be cultivated in January then.
Also from the above table we can see that Geetha gets highest profit if she follows the condition given in option 3.
Hence, option (c).
Workspace:
Which of the following schedules would maximize her annual profit while minimizing the costs, if Geetha decides NOT to repeat a crop in a calendar year?
- A.
Crops A, B and E
- B.
Crops B, D and F
- C.
Crops B, D, E and F
- D.
Crops C, D and F
- E.
Crops A, B, D or E
Answer: Option A
Join our Telegram Group for CAT/MBA Preparation.
Explanation :
Note: All calculated prices are per unit and in $
Option C can be straightaway eliminated as total months required would be 2 + 3 + 4 + 4 = 13 which will not be possible in a single year
We can clearly see that option 1 satisfies the criteria of both maximum profit at minimum cost.
Hence, option (a).
Workspace:
Feedback
Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.