Please submit your concern

Explanation:

Option 1 is a strong argument as the sweets are close to expiry and there is no harm in consuming them immediately.
Option 2 is unethical on the part of Purushottam as he tries to put the entire responsibility on the shoulders of the customers. So, eliminate option 2.
Option 3 is unethical as offering sweets close to expiry at a low cost does not rule out the possibility of the customers falling sick due to its consumption. So, eliminate option 3.
Option 4 gives a concrete evidence in order to justify this practice and a clean history reduces the probability of negative consequences to a greater extent.
Option 5 is passive in nature and can be eliminated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.

Feedback

Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.


© 2024 | All Rights Reserved | Apti4All