Please submit your concern

Explanation:

Maintaining a status-quo, i.e. taking no action at all, would convey a wrong message to the public and the media; it can have a negative impact on the party's future.
Expelling Mr. Prodigal is certain to upset Mr. Loyal, as the fact that he has a weakness for his son is common knowledge.
If an internal inquiry is set against Mr. Prodigal, it may upset Mr. Loyal. The party cannot afford the risk of losing Mr. Loyal as he is an asset to the party.
The safest bet for the party would be to temporarily dismiss Mr. Prodigal, and take him back if he is acquitted of the murder charge. This course of action would not only help the party gain some brownie points with the public and media, but will also not upset Mr. Loyal as much as the other alternatives can.
Option 5 if implemented will definitely affect the party in an adverse manner, as Mr. Loyal is an asset to them.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.

Feedback

Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.


© 2024 | All Rights Reserved | Apti4All