Please submit your concern

Explanation:

The essence of the paragraph is the difficulty in differentiating between “Western” and “Eastern” thoughts.
The paragraph starts with a difference between “Western” and “Eastern” and moves on to “thoughts”.
The logical completion of the paragraph needs to be in that vein.
Option 2 is logically inconsistent due to the word “dichotomous” between “occidentalism” and “orientalism” whereas the paragraph states that this dichotomy is “illusory”.
Option 3 moves back again to the broad idea of “Western” and “Eastern”.
Option 4 is contrary to the paragraph.
Option 5 completes the paragraph logically. The usage of the words, ‘thought’ and ‘purity’ (pure) in a slightly different manner makes it the ideal choice as it resonates with the paragraph in that “given the intellectual and intellectual interconnections” that exist today the origin of a thought can no longer be classified as purely “Western” or purely “Indian.” Therefore the origin of a thought cannot be pure in terms of origin.
Both, options 1 and 5, state the idea of thoughts not being easily classified. However, option 5 continues the idea of purity mentioned in the final part of the paragraph whereas option 1 does not. In this context, 1 is generic and 5 is specific.
Hence, the correct answer is option 5.

Feedback

Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.


© 2024 | All Rights Reserved | Apti4All