Please submit your concern

Explanation:

From paragraph eight, revolutionary claims may get the tension resolved at the expense of discipline but the need for discipline is definitely not a hindrance. Option 4 can therefore, be eliminated.
A dynamic leader is supposed to bridge the gap between equality and inequality. Therefore, the principle of equality before law is not a hindrance. Therefore, option 1 can be ruled out. Judicial activism has not been mentioned in the passage in this context. Option 2 can be eliminated.
In the last paragraph, the author mentions - “From the argument that formal equality or equality before the law is but a limited good, it is often one short step to the argument that it is a hindrance or an obstacle to the establishment of real or substantive equality. The conflict between a ‘progressive’ executive and a ‘conservative’ judiciary is but one aspect of this larger problem.” Thus, a ‘conservative judiciary’ is a hindrance.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.