Discussion

Explanation:

Since the law “Mass of an object never seems to change” underwent a correction in future, it is definitely not a complete truth but an approximation. Hence, option (a) can be concluded.
The phrase “complete truth so far as we know” clearly suggests that both the statements are approximation to complete truth. Hence, option (b) can be concluded.
Statement I is a definite approximation. Statement II can be regarded as complete truth only when the object is moving at a high speed. Hence, option (d) can be concluded.
The last paragraph says that “philosophically, we are completely wrong with the approximate law.”
Statement I is an approximate law as per the above explanation and hence is philosophically wrong. Hence, option (d) can be concluded.
While we can infer that the first statement is an experimental deduction, it cannot be inferred that the second statement is formed by the theoretical physicists.
Hence, the correct answer is option 5.

» Your doubt will be displayed only after approval.


Doubts


Feedback

Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.


© 2024 | All Rights Reserved | Apti4All