Discussion

Explanation:

The main statement clearly states that if the orangutan
(O) belongs to the set of not angry (NA), he cannot belong to the set of frowns (F). Also, O must belong to either of the two sets.

CB states that O is not F and is NA. And DA states that O is not NA and is F. Therefore, both CB and DA are logically valid.

» Your doubt will be displayed only after approval.


Doubts


Feedback

Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.


© 2024 | All Rights Reserved | Apti4All