CAT 2019 VARC Slot 2 | Previous Year CAT Paper
Answer the following questions based on the information given below.
War, natural disasters and climate change are destroying some of the world's most precious cultural sites. Google is trying to help preserve these archaeological wonders by allowing users access to 3D images of these treasures through its site.
But the project is raising questions about Google's motivations and about who should own the digital copyrights. Some critics call it a form of "digital colonialism."
When it comes to archaeological treasures, the losses have been mounting. ISIS blew up parts of the ancient city of Palmyra in Syria and an earthquake hit Bagan, an ancient city in Myanmar, damaging dozens of temples, in 2016. In the past, all archaeologists and historians had for restoration and research were photos, drawings, remnants and intuition.
But that's changing. Before the earthquake at Bagan, many of the temples on the site were scanned. . . . [These] scans . . . are on Google's Arts & Culture site. The digital renditions allow viewers to virtually wander the halls of the temple, look up-close at paintings and turn the building over, to look up at its chambers. . . . [Google Arts & Culture] works with museums and other nonprofits . . . to put high-quality images online.
The images of the temples in Bagan are part of a collaboration with CyArk, a nonprofit that creates the 3D scanning of historic sites. . . . Google . . . says [it] doesn't make money off this website, but it fits in with Google's mission to make the world's information available and useful.
Critics say the collaboration could be an attempt by a large corporation to wrap itself in the sheen of culture. Ethan Watrall, an archaeologist, professor at Michigan State University and a member of the Society for American Archaeology, says he's not comfortable with the arrangement between CyArk and Google. . . . Watrall says this project is just a way for Google to promote Google. "They want to make this material accessible so people will browse it and be filled with wonder by it," he says. "But at its core, it's all about advertisements and driving traffic." Watrall says these images belong on the site of a museum or educational institution, where there is serious scholarship and a very different mission. . . .
[There's] another issue for some archaeologists and art historians. CyArk owns the copyrights of the scans — not the countries where these sites are located. That means the countries need CyArk's permission to use these images for commercial purposes.
Erin Thompson, a professor of art crime at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, says it's the latest example of a Western nation appropriating a foreign culture, a centuries-long battle. . . . CyArk says it copyrights the scans so no one can use them in an inappropriate way. The company says it works closely with authorities during the process, even training local people to help. But critics like Thompson are not persuaded. . . . She would prefer the scans to be owned by the countries and people where these sites are located.
By “digital colonialism”, critics of the CyArk–Google project are referring to the fact that:
- A.
countries where the scanned sites are located do not own the scan copyrights.
- B.
CyArk and Google have not shared the details of digitisation with the host countries.
- C.
the scanning process can damage delicate frescos and statues at the sites.
- D.
CyArk and Google have been scanning images without copyright permission from host countries.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
Its important to understand the meaning of the term 'digital colonization' with respect to the passage. After a clear understanding of the passage, we know it revolves around 'who should own the copyrights'. Since its mentioned as critics point of view in the passage. Hence its about countries where these sites are located but these countries not owning the rights to the scanned images. Hence Option 1 is the correct one. Option 4 is similar in meaning but it does not take into account the fact that only if you own the copyrights you can give permission for the same.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
In Dr. Thompson’s view, CyArk owning the copyright of its digital scans of archaeological sites is akin to:
- A.
the illegal downloading of content from the internet.
- B.
the seizing of ancient Egyptian artefacts by a Western museum.
- C.
digital platforms capturing users’ data for market research.
- D.
tourists uploading photos of monuments onto social media.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
While answering this question is important to note that we are looking for the right analogy that is in sync with the part of owning the copyright, with respect to it being your entity but someone else owning the rights for the same. In this case, Option 2 where Egyptian artefacts are actually owned by the Western museum. Other options don't provide the correct analogy with respect to owning the entity and owning the rights for the same, and hence are incorrect.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
Based on his views mentioned in the passage, one could best characterise Dr. Watrall as being:
- A.
dismissive of laypeople’s access to specialist images of archaeological and cultural sites.
- B.
uneasy about the marketing of archaeological images for commercial use by firms such as Google and CyArk.
- C.
critical about the links between a non-profit and a commercial tech platform for distributing archaeological images.
- D.
opposed to the use of digital technology in archaeological and cultural sites in developing countries.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
Students must ensure that they read Option 4 correctly, Watrall nowhere mentions that he is against the 'technology' of Google, but it’s about the intention of Google. He is no way trying to portray that the images should not be available to common people. Now between 2 and 3 it’s important to understand the meaning of words to eliminate answer choices, now Option 3 is a better pick because Watrall's only guessed the actual usage of these pictures by Google, there is no certainty about this.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly invalidate Dr. Watrall’s objections?
- A.
CyArk uploads its scanned images of archaeological sites onto museum websites only.
- B.
There is a ban on CyArk scanning archeological sites located in other countries.
- C.
CyArk does not own the copyright on scanned images of archaeological sites.
- D.
Google takes down advertisements on its website hosting CyArk’s scanned images.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
From the line “these images belong on the site of a museum” we can clearly understand that we need to look for an answer that invalidates Dr Watrall’s objection. This is only possible if Option 1 is true.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
Of the following arguments, which one is LEAST likely to be used by the companies that digitally scan cultural sites?
- A.
It enables people who cannot physically visit these sites to experience them.
- B.
It provides images free of cost to all users.
- C.
It allows a large corporation to project itself as a protector of culture.
- D.
It helps preserve precious images in case the sites are damaged or destroyed.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
Its important to understand all the points that Google and CyArk have put forth in their defense. To answer this question, we should look for options that these two companies will definitely not agree on. According to this, Option 3 will prove to be some sort of a dictatorship analogy and hence cannot be chosen by the companies. Protector of a culture may not be the same as a promoter of culture and hence the correct answer is 3.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Answer the following questions based on the information given below.
Around the world, capital cities are disgorging bureaucrats. In the post-colonial fervour of the 20th century, coastal capitals picked by trade-focused empires were spurned for “regionally neutral” new ones . . . . But decamping wholesale is costly and unpopular; governments these days prefer piecemeal dispersal. The trend reflects how the world has changed. In past eras, when information travelled at a snail’s pace, civil servants had to cluster together. But now desk-workers can ping emails and video-chat around the world. Travel for face-to-face meetings may be unavoidable, but transport links, too, have improved. . . .
Proponents of moving civil servants around promise countless benefits. It disperses the risk that a terrorist attack or natural disaster will cripple an entire government. Wonks in the sticks will be inspired by new ideas that walled-off capitals cannot conjure up. Autonomous regulators perform best far from the pressure and lobbying of the big city. Some even hail a cure for ascendant cynicism and populism. The unloved bureaucrats of faraway capitals will become as popular as firefighters once they mix with regular folk.
Beyond these sunny visions, dispersing central-government functions usually has three specific aims: to improve the lives of both civil servants and those living in clogged capitals; to save money; and to redress regional imbalances. The trouble is that these goals are not always realised.
The first aim—improving living conditions—has a long pedigree. After the second world war Britain moved thousands of civil servants to “agreeable English country towns” as London was rebuilt. But swapping the capital for somewhere smaller is not always agreeable. Attrition rates can exceed 80%. . . . The second reason to pack bureaucrats off is to save money. Office space costs far more in capitals. . . . Agencies that are moved elsewhere can often recruit better workers on lower salaries than in capitals, where well-paying multinationals mop up talent.
The third reason to shift is to rebalance regional inequality. . . . Norway treats federal jobs as a resource every region deserves to enjoy, like profits from oil. Where government jobs go, private ones follow. . . . Sometimes the aim is to fulfil the potential of a country’s second-tier cities. Unlike poor, remote places, bigger cities can make the most of relocated government agencies, linking them to local universities and businesses and supplying a better-educated workforce. The decision in 1946 to set up America’s Centres for Disease Control in Atlanta rather than Washington, D.C., has transformed the city into a hub for health-sector research and business.
The dilemma is obvious. Pick small, poor towns, and areas of high unemployment get new jobs, but it is hard to attract the most qualified workers; opt for larger cities with infrastructure and better-qualified residents, and the country’s most deprived areas see little benefit. . . .
Others contend that decentralisation begets corruption by making government agencies less accountable. . . . A study in America found that state-government corruption is worse when the state capital is isolated—journalists, who tend to live in the bigger cities, become less watchful of those in power.
The “dilemma” mentioned in the passage refers to:
- A.
relocating government agencies to boost growth in remote areas with poor amenities or to relatively larger cities with good amenities.
- B.
concentrating on decongesting large cities or focusing on boosting employment in relatively larger cities.
- C.
encouraging private enterprises to relocate to smaller towns or not incentivising them in order to keep government costs in those towns low.
- D.
keeping government agencies in the largest city with good infrastructure or moving them to a remote area with few amenities.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
This question highlights the dilemma presented in the second last paragraph, to pick small towns or go for larger cities. Now after understanding this, lets eliminate options, Option 2 is straight away rejected because it does not mention the two options, similarly you can eliminate option 4. Now option 3 is out of scope since it does not mention anything that has been conveyed in the passage. Option 1 is the correct answer since its on similar lines as the dilemma mentioned in the passage.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The “long pedigree” of the aim to shift civil servants to improve their living standards implies that this move:
- A.
is not a new idea and has been tried in the past.
- B.
is supported by politicians and the ruling elites.
- C.
takes a long time to achieve its intended outcomes.
- D.
has become common practice in several countries worldwide.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
This question requires a prior vocabulary knowledge. ‘Pedigree’ means history, so a long pedigree means having a long history, hence only option 1 seems as the right option.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
According to the author, relocating government agencies has not always been a success for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:
- A.
increased avenues of corruption away from the capital city.
- B.
a rise in pollution levels and congestion in the new locations.
- C.
the difficulty of attracting talented, well-skilled people in more remote areas.
- D.
high staff losses, as people may not be prepared to move to smaller towns.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
In this question, we already know the author's viewpoint that relocating government agencies have not always been a success, so we need to look for an option which is not one of the reasons. Corruption has been mentioned towards the end of the passage. Difficulty in attracting talent and staff loses is also mentioned in the passage. However, Option 2 is not stated as a reason and hence has to be the correct answer option.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
According to the passage, colonial powers located their capitals:
- A.
to promote their trading interests.
- B.
to showcase their power and prestige.
- C.
where they had the densest populations.
- D.
based on political expediency.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
This question can be answered through reading the first paragraph. The passage mentions coastal capitals picked by trade-focused empires were spurned, hence we know that colonial powers were focused on trade.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
People who support decentralising central government functions are LEAST likely to cite which of the following reasons for their view?
- A.
More independence could be enjoyed by regulatory bodies located away from political centres.
- B.
It could weaken the nexus between bureaucrats and media in the capital.
- C.
Policy makers may benefit from fresh thinking in a new environment.
- D.
It reduces expenses as infrastructure costs and salaries are lower in smaller cities.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
When the question mentions least likely, we need to choose an answer that would not be used by people who support decentralizing of central government functions. So out of all the options we need to look for those which are in support and the ones which are against. Cost factor and salaries has been discussed as in the passage, hence it supports decentralization. Autonomy and new ideas are mentioned in the second paragraph hence we can eliminate option 1 and 3 as well. Option 2 is not given as a support point of decentralization; hence it is the correct answer choice.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
British colonial policy . . . went through two policy phases, or at least there were two strategies between which its policies actually oscillated, sometimes to its great advantage. At first, the new colonial apparatus exercised caution, and occupied India by a mix of military power and subtle diplomacy, the high ground in the middle of the circle of circles. This, however, pushed them into contradictions. For, whatever their sense of the strangeness of the country and the thinness of colonial presence, the British colonial state represented the great conquering discourse of Enlightenment rationalism, entering India precisely at the moment of its greatest unchecked arrogance. As inheritors and representatives of this discourse, which carried everything before it, this colonial state could hardly adopt for long such a self-denying attitude. It had restructured everything in Europe—the productive system, the political regimes, the moral and cognitive orders—and would do the same in India, particularly as some empirically inclined theorists of that generation considered the colonies a massive laboratory of utilitarian or other theoretical experiments. Consequently, the colonial state could not settle simply for eminence at the cost of its marginality; it began to take initiatives to introduce the logic of modernity into Indian society. But this modernity did not enter a passive society. Sometimes, its initiatives were resisted by pre-existing structural forms. At times, there was a more direct form of collective resistance. Therefore the map of continuity and discontinuity that this state left behind at the time of independence was rather complex and has to be traced with care.
Most significantly, of course, initiatives for . . . modernity came to assume an external character. The acceptance of modernity came to be connected, ineradicably, with subjection. This again points to two different problems, one theoretical, the other political. Theoretically, because modernity was externally introduced, it is explanatorily unhelpful to apply the logical format of the ‘transition process’ to this pattern of change. Such a logical format would be wrong on two counts. First, however subtly, it would imply that what was proposed to be built was something like European capitalism. (And, in any case, historians have forcefully argued that what it was to replace was not like feudalism, with or without modificatory adjectives.)
But, more fundamentally, the logical structure of endogenous change does not apply here. Here transformation agendas attack as an external force. This externality is not something that can be casually mentioned and forgotten. It is inscribed on every move, every object, every proposal, every legislative act, each line of causality. It comes to be marked on the epoch itself. This repetitive emphasis on externality should not be seen as a nationalist initiative that is so well rehearsed in Indian social science. . . .
Quite apart from the externality of the entire historical proposal of modernity, some of its contents were remarkable. . . . Economic reforms, or rather alterations . . . did not foreshadow the construction of a classical capitalist economy, with its necessary emphasis on extractive and transport sectors. What happened was the creation of a degenerate version of capitalism —what early dependency theorists called the ‘development of underdevelopment’.
“Consequently, the colonial state could not settle simply for eminence at the cost of its marginality; it began to take initiatives to introduce the logic of modernity into Indian society.” Which of the following best captures the sense of this statement?
- A.
The colonial enterprise was a costly one; so to justify the cost it began to take initiatives to introduce the logic of modernity into Indian society
- B.
The cost of the colonial state’s eminence was not settled; therefore, it took the initiative of introducing modernity into Indian society.
- C.
The colonial state’s eminence was unsettled by its marginal position; therefore, it developed Indian society by modernising it.
- D.
The colonial state felt marginalised from Indian society because of its own modernity; therefore, it sought to address that marginalisation by bringing its modernity to change Indian society.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
This question also requires some hold on vocabulary, ‘marginality’ means to consider something as insignificant or not important. Now the colonial state was marginalized because it was at the periphery of the Indian society, so the colonial state here refers to the small ruling elite. Even if we try to answer the question only through our understanding of the word marginalize, we can see that besides option 4, no other option captures the correct essence of the meaning.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
All of the following statements about British colonialism can be inferred from the first paragraph, EXCEPT that it:
- A.
faced resistance from existing structural forms of Indian modernity.
- B.
allowed the treatment of colonies as experimental sites.
- C.
was at least partly shaped by the project of European modernity
- D.
was at least partly an outcome of Enlightenment rationalism.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
This question can be answered by understanding the first paragraph itself. We can infer all the options except Option 1. The idea for experimental sites is given in paragraph 1, similarly, we can infer enlightenment rationalism as the motivation behind the change in colonial policy. If we read the sentence “It had restructured everything in Europe…” we can infer Option 3 as well. So we have evidence for Options 2,3 and 4. Now let’s look at why Option 1 cannot be inferred. It's important to read the Option carefully and understand how different it is from the actual passage. It did face resistance, but this resistance was not from modernity but from existing structural reforms, hence Option cannot be inferred and is the correct answer Option.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
Which of the following observations is a valid conclusion to draw from the author’s statement that “the logical structure of endogenous change does not apply here. Here transformation agendas attack as an external force”?
- A.
The transformation of Indian society did not happen organically, but was forced by colonial agendas
- B.
Colonised societies cannot be changed through logic; they need to be transformed with external force.
- C.
The endogenous logic of colonialism can only bring change if it attacks and transforms external forces.
- D.
Indian society is not endogamous; it is more accurately characterised as aggressively exogamous.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
It's crucial for students to know the meaning of the word Endogenous to answer this question correctly. It means having an internal cause or origin. In answer Option 4, a new term Endogamous is used which has a different meaning, it means having a marriage within a specific type, so this Option has to be eliminated. Similarly, 2 and 3 also do not make sense given the meaning of Endogenous. In Option 1, since the word ‘organically’ has been used it has a relation with origin, hence this is the correct answer choice.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
All of the following statements, if true, could be seen as supporting the arguments in the passage, EXCEPT:
- A.
the change in British colonial policy was induced by resistance to modernity in Indian society.
- B.
modernity was imposed upon India by the British and, therefore, led to underdevelopment.
- C.
the introduction of capitalism in India was not through the transformation of feudalism, as happened in Europe.
- D.
throughout the history of colonial conquest, natives have often been experimented on by the colonisers.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
The points mentioned in the passage will be in support of the author’s argument, anything besides that will have to be the correct answer here. The author mentions historians who have proposed that Capitalism in India was not introduced with any modifications, hence this is in support of the author. The author also mentions that colonies were experimental labs so Option 4 is also not the correct choice. Towards the end of the passage, the author says that because modernity was externally imposed, the underdeveloped became developed, hence Option 2 is eliminated as well. Now between Option 3 and Option 1, Option 1 is the correct choice because the framing of the sentence is incorrect.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
Which one of the following 5-word sequences best captures the flow of the arguments in the passage?
- A.
Military power—arrogance—laboratory—modernity—capitalism.
- B.
Colonial policy—arrogant rationality—resistance—independence—development.
- C.
Military power—colonialism—restructuring—feudalism—capitalism.
- D.
Colonial policy—Enlightenment—external modernity—subjection— underdevelopment.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
In the passage, the author talks about the development of underdeveloped, and the opening of the passage is through the mention of British colonial policy. Hence clearly Option 4 is the correct choice.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
Answer the following question based on the information given below.
The magic of squatter cities is that they are improved steadily and gradually by their residents. To a planner’s eye, these cities look chaotic. I trained as a biologist and to my eye, they look organic. Squatter cities are also unexpectedly green. They have maximum density—1 million people per square mile in some areas of Mumbai—and have minimum energy and material use. People get around by foot, bicycle, rickshaw, or the universal shared taxi.
Not everything is efficient in the slums, though. In the Brazilian favelas where electricity is stolen and therefore free, people leave their lights on all day. But in most slums recycling is literally a way of life. The Dharavi slum in Mumbai has 400 recycling units and 30,000 ragpickers. Six thousand tons of rubbish are sorted every day. In 2007, the Economist reported that in Vietnam and Mozambique, “Waves of gleaners sift the sweepings of Hanoi’s streets, just as Mozambiquan children pick over the rubbish of Maputo’s main tip. Every city in Asia and Latin America has an industry based on gathering up old cardboard boxes.” . . .
In his 1985 article, Calthorpe made a statement that still jars with most people: “The city is the most environmentally benign form of human settlement. Each city dweller consumes less land, less energy, less water, and produces less pollution than his counterpart in settlements of lower densities.” “Green Manhattan” was the inflammatory title of a 2004 New Yorker article by David Owen. “By the most significant measures,” he wrote, “New York is the greenest community in the United States, and one of the greenest cities in the world . . . The key to New York’s relative environmental benignity is its extreme compactness. . . . Placing one and a half million people on a twenty-three-square-mile island sharply reduces their opportunities to be wasteful.” He went on to note that this very compactness forces people to live in the world’s most energy-efficient apartment buildings. . . .
Urban density allows half of humanity to live on 2.8 per cent of the land. . . . Consider just the infrastructure efficiencies. According to a 2004 UN report: “The concentration of population and enterprises in urban areas greatly reduces the unit cost of piped water, sewers, drains, roads, electricity, garbage collection, transport, health care, and schools.” . . .
[T]he nationally subsidised city of Manaus in northern Brazil “answers the question” of how to stop deforestation: give people decent jobs. Then they can afford houses, and gain security. One hundred thousand people who would otherwise be deforesting the jungle around Manaus are now prospering in town making such things as mobile phones and televisions. . . .
Of course, fast-growing cities are far from an unmitigated good. They concentrate crime, pollution, disease and injustice as much as business, innovation, education and entertainment. . . . But if they are overall a net good for those who move there, it is because cities offer more than just jobs. They are transformative: in the slums, as well as the office towers and leafy suburbs, the progress is from hick to metropolitan to cosmopolitan . . .
We can infer that Calthorpe’s statement “still jars” with most people because most people:
- A.
do not regard cities as good places to live in.
- B.
consider cities to be very crowded and polluted.
- C.
regard cities as places of disease and crime.
- D.
do not consider cities to be eco-friendly places.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
In the third paragraph, it is mentioned that Calthorpe’s statement “The city is the most environmentally benign…” so we need to look for an answer that is opposite to what he has said. because what people believe in and what Calthorpe has to say are contradictory in nature. In Option 2, the idea of crowdedness is out of context, so can be eliminated. Option 1 is too broad. Option 3 is also out of context. Hence the correct answer has to be option 4 because it captures the idea that is opposite of Calthrope’s views and in line with the general public.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
According to the passage, squatter cities are environment-friendly for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:
- A.
they sort out garbage.
- B.
their streets are kept clean.
- C.
their transportation is energy efficient.
- D.
they recycle material.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
This question requires a basic understanding of what will be the environment efficient option, now 3 and 4 can be eliminated because obviously being energy efficient and recycling will help the environment tremendously. Now between sorting garbage and keep streets clean, sorting garbage will have a better impact on the environment and is also mentioned in the passage.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
From the passage it can be inferred that cities are good places to live in for all of the following reasons EXCEPT that they:
- A.
help prevent destruction of the environment.
- B.
offer employment opportunities.
- C.
have suburban areas as well as office areas.
- D.
contribute to the cultural transformation of residents.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
With the example of Manaus towards the end of the passage, we can easily eliminate the Options 1 and 2 because we can infer that cities help create jobs and they prevent destruction of environment. The cultural transformation part has been mentioned in the passage and hence Option 4 can be eliminated as well. It can be misleading, because we might feel Option 3 can also be deduced, but it's important to understand this option in depth to point out the differences.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Which one of the following statements would undermine the author’s stand regarding the greenness of cities?
- A.
Over the last decade the cost of utilities has been increasing for city dwellers.
- B.
Sorting through rubbish contributes to the rapid spread of diseases in the slums.
- C.
The compactness of big cities in the West increases the incidence of violent crime.
- D.
The high density of cities leads to an increase in carbon dioxide and global warming.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
The question talks about greenness hence we need to focus on only that part, with this and through elimination technique, we can get the answer. Option 1 and 3 are out of context and hence can be easily eliminated. Because as per Option 1 is increasing CO2, the idea of greenness does not make any sense. And in Option 3, there is a mention of ‘violent crimes’ which has no link to greenness. Now in Option 2 the high cost of utilities, also has no relation to the greenness.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
In the context of the passage, the author refers to Manaus in order to:
- A.
promote cities as employment hubs for people.
- B.
explain where cities source their labour for factories.
- C.
explain how urban areas help the environment.
- D.
describe the infrastructure efficiencies of living in a city.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
It’s important to understand the context in which the author discusses Manaus. The answer revolves around stopping deforestation. In the passage when we read the last paragraph, we can eliminate Options 2 and 4. Now between 1 and 3, 3 highlights that the purpose of giving jobs is to stop deforestation. Hence this has to be the correct choice.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Answer the following questions based on the information given below.
For two years, I tracked down dozens of . . . Chinese in Upper Egypt [who were] selling lingerie. In a deeply conservative region, where Egyptian families rarely allow women to work or own businesses, the Chinese flourished because of their status as outsiders. They didn’t gossip, and they kept their opinions to themselves. In a New Yorker article entitled “Learning to Speak Lingerie,” I described the Chinese use of Arabic as another non-threatening characteristic. I wrote, “Unlike Mandarin, Arabic is inflected for gender, and Chinese dealers, who learn the language strictly by ear, often pick up speech patterns from female customers. I’ve come to think of it as the lingerie dialect, and there’s something disarming about these Chinese men speaking in the feminine voice.” . . .
When I wrote about the Chinese in the New Yorker, most readers seemed to appreciate the unusual perspective. But as I often find with topics that involve the Middle East, some people had trouble getting past the black-and-white quality of a byline. “This piece is so orientalist I don’t know what to do,” Aisha Gani, a reporter who worked at The Guardian, tweeted. Another colleague at the British paper, Iman Amrani, agreed: “I wouldn’t have minded an article on the subject written by an Egyptian woman—probably would have had better insight.” . . .
As an MOL (man of language), I also take issue with this kind of essentialism. Empathy and understanding are not inherited traits, and they are not strictly tied to gender and race. An individual who wrestles with a difficult language can learn to be more sympathetic to outsiders and open to different experiences of the world. This learning process—the embarrassments, the frustrations, the gradual sense of understanding and connection—is invariably transformative. In Upper Egypt, the Chinese experience of struggling to learn Arabic and local culture had made them much more thoughtful. In the same way, I was interested in their lives not because of some kind of voyeurism, but because I had also experienced Egypt and Arabic as an outsider. And both the Chinese and the Egyptians welcomed me because I spoke their languages. My identity as a white male was far less important than my ability to communicate.
And that easily lobbed word—“Orientalist”—hardly captures the complexity of our interactions. What exactly is the dynamic when a man from Missouri observes a Zhejiang native selling lingerie to an Upper Egyptian woman? . . . If all of us now stand beside the same river, speaking in ways we all understand, who’s looking east and who’s looking west? Which way is Oriental?
For all of our current interest in identity politics, there’s no corresponding sense of identity linguistics. You are what you speak—the words that run throughout your mind are at least as fundamental to your selfhood as is your ethnicity or your gender. And sometimes it’s healthy to consider human characteristics that are not inborn, rigid, and outwardly defined. After all, you can always learn another language and change who you are.
According to the passage, which of the following is not responsible for language’s ability to change us?
- A.
Language’s ability to mediate the impact of identity markers one is born with.
- B.
Language’s intrinsic connection to our notions of self and identity
- C.
The twists and turns in the evolution of language over time.
- D.
The ups and downs involved in the course of learning a language.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
We need to pick an answer that has a connect with language’s ability to change us. In case of Option 3, there is absolutely no link with this, hence this is the correct answer. The line “My identity as a white male…” justifies Option 1, hence it can be eliminated. The third last paragraph clearly mentions Option 4 and Option 2.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
A French ethnographer decides to study the culture of a Nigerian tribe. Which of the following is most likely to be the view of the author of the passage?
- A.
The author would encourage the ethnographer and recommend him/her to hire a good translator for the purpose of holding interviews.
- B.
The author would encourage the ethnographer, but ask him/her to first learn the language of the Nigerian tribe s/he wishes to study.
- C.
The author would discourage the ethnographer from conducting the study as Nigerian ethnographers can better understand the tribe.
- D.
The author would encourage the ethnographer, but ask him/her to be mindful of his/her racial and gender identity in the process.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
You will need to understand and analyze the passage well to get this question right, it’s on the difficult side because you cannot get the answer directly in the passage. Throughout the passage we get an understanding that the author is in favor of people learning new languages and breaking cultural barriers. In case of Option 2, a French ethnographer learning the culture of a Nigerian tribe, is in sync with what the author says in the entire passage.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
Which of the following can be inferred from the author’s claim, “Which way is Oriental?”
- A.
Learning another language can mitigate cultural hierarchies and barriers.
- B.
Orientalism is a discourse of the past, from colonial times, rarely visible today.
- C.
Globalisation has mitigated cultural hierarchies and barriers.
- D.
Goodwill alone mitigates cultural hierarchies and barriers.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
Orientalism is used here in the context of identity. The author mentions that language breaks all the cultural barriers. Option 1 is correct because it includes learning another language so it is in line with what the author keeps mentioning. Option 4 is eliminated because goodwill and globalization have no link. Option 2 does not make use of the word Orientalism in context of the passage.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The author’s critics would argue that:
- A.
Language is insufficient to bridge cultural barriers.
- B.
Linguistic politics can be erased.
- C.
Empathy can overcome identity politics.
- D.
Orientalism cannot be practiced by Egyptians.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
Here Option 2 will be in support of the author's main argument and hence cannot be the correct answer. We need to look for an answer that is contrary to what the author is saying in the passage. This is possible only through Option 1. Option 4 is out of context, and Option 3 has no link with language.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper order for the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer.
- Living things—animals and plants—typically exhibit correlational structure.
- Adaptive behaviour depends on cognitive economy, treating objects as equivalent.
- The information we receive from our senses, from the world, typically has structure and order, and is not arbitrary.
- To categorize an object means to consider it equivalent to other things in that category, and different—along some salient dimension—from things that are not.
Answer: 2431
Explanation :
This is a difficult question and we need to closely analyze each sentence to form the correct sequence. Now after reading all the four sentences, we know 2 and 4 will form a mandatory pair, since both of them talk about ‘objects’. Now 3 and 1 form a pair, if we think about it, the structure and order mentioned in sentence 3, is further elaborated in sentence 1. Now we need to see which pair will start the sequence. Between 31 and 24, 24 is a better starter.
Hence the correct answer is 2431.
Workspace:
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper order for the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer.
- Conceptualisations of ‘women’s time’ as contrary to clock-time and clock-time as synonymous with economic rationalism are two of the deleterious results of this representation.
- While dichotomies of ‘men’s time’, ‘women’s time’, clock-time, and caring time can be analytically useful, this article argues that everyday caring practices incorporate a multiplicity of times; and both men and women can engage in these multiple-times
- When the everyday practices of working sole fathers and working sole mothers are carefully examined to explore conceptualisations of gendered time, it is found that caring time is often more focused on the clock than generally theorised.
- Clock-time has been consistently represented in feminist literature as a masculine artefact representative of a ‘time is money’ perspective.
Answer: 4132
Explanation :
Clearly, sentence 4 has to start the sequence because it introduces the concept of clock-time. Next we see a mandatory pair of sentences 1 and 3, because exploring conceptualizations of gendered times, mentioned in 3 is an elaboration of the conceptualization mentioned in sentence 1. Sentence 2 hence acts as a conclusion.
Hence, the correct answer is 4132.
Workspace:
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper order for the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer.
- To the uninitiated listener, atonal music can sound like chaotic, random noise.
- Atonality is a condition of music in which the constructs of the music do not ‘live’ within the confines of a particular key signature, scale, or mode.
- After you realize the amount of knowledge, skill, and technical expertise required to compose or perform it, your tune may change, so to speak.
- However, atonality is one of the most important movements in 20th century music.
Answer: 2143
Explanation :
After reading the four sentences, we know sentences 3 and 4 cannot start the sequence because they make use of conjunctions which connote that some other sentence must be preceded in this. Now because sentence 4 uses ‘however’ the sentence before that has to have a contradictory idea, this idea is present in 1, hence we have 1 and 4 as the mandatory pair in this order. Now in sentence 1 we see ‘your tune may change’, this tune is in reference to what is mentioned in sentence 1. Hence the order becomes 143. So 2 has to start the sequence.
Hence, the correct answer is 2143.
Workspace:
Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Choose its number as your answer and key it in.
- A particularly interesting example of inference occurs in many single panel comics.
- It’s the creator’s participation and imagination that makes the single-panel comic so engaging and so rewarding.
- Often, the humor requires you to imagine what happened in the instant immediately before or immediately after the panel you’re being shown.
- To get the joke, you actually have to figure out what some of these missing panels must be.
- It is as though the cartoonist devised a series of panels to tell the story and has chosen to show you only one – and typically not even the funniest.
Answer: 2
Explanation :
We might feel that all the sentences are connected after the first read and hence this question might seem difficult. If we try to order the sentences first to get the odd one out, we know the sequence starter would either be sentence 1 or 2. Between both of them sentence 1 seems a better pick. Hence we get the sequence 1345 by using parajumble rules. Sentence 2 mentions that the creator is participating, which is not the case keeping in mind the rest of the sentences, hence sentence 2 is the odd one out.
Hence, the correct answer is 2.
Workspace:
Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Choose its number as your answer and key it in.
- Ocean plastic is problematic for a number of reasons, but primarily because marine animals eat it.
- The largest numerical proportion of ocean plastic falls in small size fractions.
- Aside from clogging up the digestive tracts of marine life, plastic also tends to adsorb pollutants from the water column.
- Plastic in the oceans is arguably one of the most important and pervasive environmental problems today.
- Eating plastic has a number of negative consequences such as the retention of plastic particles in the gut for longer periods than normal food particles.
Answer: 2
Explanation :
Sentence 5 and 3 form a pair, because they both talk about retention of plastic particles and clogging of digestive tracts. Now 5 is related to 1, because in 1 the author talks about marine animals consuming plastic, this acts as an introduction to 5. So 153 becomes a pair. Now 4 will act as an introductory sentence to the entire sequence, thereby forming the sequence of 4153. So sentence 2 becomes the odd one out.
Hence, the correct answer is 2.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
Language is an autapomorphy found only in our lineage, and not shared with other branches of our group such as primates. We also have no definitive evidence that any species other than Homo sapiens ever had language. However, it must be noted straightaway that ‘language’ is not a monolithic entity, but rather a complex bundle of traits that must have evolved over a significant time frame…. Moreover, language crucially draws on aspects of cognition that are long established in the primate lineage, such as memory: the language faculty as a whole comprises more than just the uniquely linguistic features.
- A.
Language is not a single, uniform entity but the end result of a long and complex process of linguistic evolution.
- B.
Language, a derived trait found only in humans, has evolved over time and involves memory.
- C.
Language is a distinctively human feature as there is no evidence of the existence of language in any other species.
- D.
Language evolved with linguistic features building on features of cognition such as memory.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
The passage mentions that language is a human trait and not a derived trait, hence Option 2 can be eliminated. Option 1 misses on the part of language drawing on aspects of cognition as memory, hence cannot be correct. Option 3 does not include the part of language evolving with time, and hence is not the right choice. Option 4 covers all the aspects and hence is the correct answer.
Hence, the correct answer is option is 4.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
Social movement organizations often struggle to mobilize supporters from allied movements in their efforts to achieve critical mass. Organizations with hybrid identities—those whose organizational identities span the boundaries of two or more social movements, issues, or identities—are vital to mobilizing these constituencies. Studies of the post-9/11 U.S. antiwar movement show that individuals with past involvement in non-anti-war movements are more likely to join hybrid organizations than are individuals without involvement in non-anti-war movements. In addition, they show that organizations with hybrid identities occupy relatively more central positions in inter-organizational contact networks within the antiwar movement and thus recruit significantly more participants in demonstrations than do nonhybrid organizations.
- A.
Organizations with hybrid identities are able to mobilize individuals with different points of view.
- B.
Movements that work towards social change often find it difficult to mobilize a critical mass of supporters.
- C.
Hybrid organizations attract individuals that are deeply involved in anti-war movements.
- D.
Post 9/11 studies show that people who are involved in non anti-war movements are likely to join hybrid organizations.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
The passage highlights that it's easier for hybrid organizations to attract people as compared to non-hybrid organizations. Option 2 does not even mention hybrid organizations and hence can be eliminated. Option 4 is only providing the example of 9/11 and hence cannot be the right choice for summary. Option 3 also makes use of attraction of people as an example, hence cannot be the right choice. Option 1 has to be the correct choice.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper order for the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer.
- Such a belief in the harmony of nature requires a purpose presumably imposed by the goodness and wisdom of a deity.
- These parts, all fit together into an integrated, well-ordered system that was created by design.
- Historically, the notion of a balance of nature is part observational, part metaphysical, and not scientific in any way.
- It is an example of an ancient belief system called teleology, the notion that what we call nature has a predetermined destiny associated with its component parts.
Answer: 3421
Explanation :
This is an easy question; we can easily pick sentence 3 as the correct sentence starter. Other sentences either include conjunctions or words which require sentences to be preceded. Now sentences 4 and 2 form a mandatory pair, since the ‘parts’ mentioned in 4 are further elaborated in sentence 2. So we get the sequence as 3421.
Hence, the correct answer is 3421.
Workspace:
Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Choose its number as your answer and key it in.
- Socrates told us that ‘the unexamined life is not worth living’ and that to ‘know thyself’ is the path to true wisdom
- It suggests that you should adopt an ancient rhetorical method favored by the likes of Julius Caesar and known as ‘illeism’ – or speaking about yourself in the third person.
- Research has shown that people who are prone to rumination also often suffer from impaired decision making under pressure and are at a substantially increased risk of depression.
- Simple rumination – the process of churning your concerns around in your head – is not the way to achieve self-realization.
- The idea is that this small change in perspective can clear your emotional fog, allowing you to see past your biases.
Answer: 1
Explanation :
We should first try to arrange the sentences to get the odd one out. Sentence 4 introduces the concept of rumination, hence has to start the sequence, this has to be followed by sentence 3 which mentions the risk which people are at because of rumination. And according to a similar logic we can form the pair of sentences 2 and 5, since we can see a change in perspective. So the correct order is 4325, which leaves sentence 1 as the odd one out.
Hence, the correct answer is 1.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
Privacy-challenged office workers may find it hard to believe, but open-plan offices and cubicles were invented by architects and designers who thought that to break down the social walls that divide people, you had to break down the real walls, too. Modernist architects saw walls and rooms as downright fascist. The spaciousness and flexibility of an open plan would liberate homeowners and office dwellers from the confines of boxes. But companies took up their idea less out of a democratic ideology than a desire to pack in as many workers as they could. The typical open-plan office of the first half of the 20th century was a white-collar assembly line. Cubicles were interior designers’ attempt to put some soul back in.
- A.
Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as desired and therefore cubicles came into being.
- B.
Wall-free office spaces could have worked out the way their utopian inventors intended had companies cared for workers' satisfaction.
- C.
Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out the way their utopian inventors intended, as they became tools for exploitation of labor.
- D.
Wall-free office spaces did not quite work out as companies don’t believe in democratic ideology.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
Here Option 3 becomes the best choice because, after reading the passage well, we know it comprises of two parts, one being the dismantling of the walls and the other of the result in relation to selfish business interest. Option 2 can be eliminated because satisfaction of workers is not a direct link to the passage. Option 1 is not the right choice because the passage revolves around the intention of companies. Option 4 is incorrect because it ignores the labour point which is important in relation to the passage.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Feedback
Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.