CAT 2001 VARC | Previous Year Questions
For the word given at the top of each table, match the dictionary definitions on the left (A,B,C,D) with their corresponding usage on the right (E,F,G,H). Out of the four possibilities given in the boxes below the table, select the one that has all the definitions and their usages correctly matched.
Exceed
Dictionary Definition | Usage | ||
A. | To extend outside of or enlarge beyond used chiefly in strictly physical phenomena. | E. | The mercy of God exceeds our finite minds. |
B. | To be greater than or superior to | F. | Their accomplishments exceeded pur expectation. |
C. | Be beyond the comprehension of | G. | He exceeded his authority when he paid his brother's gambling debts with money from the trust. |
D. | To go beyond a limit set by (as an authority or privilege) | H. | If this rain keeps up, the river will exceed its banks by morning. |
- A.
A-H, B-F, C-E, D-G
- B.
A-H, B-E, C-F, D-G
- C.
A-G, B-F, C-E, D-H
- D.
A-F, B-G, C-H, D-E
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
With overlapping meanings, it is important to match each meaning with its respective example. D speaks of exceed in terms of going beyond the limits set by an authority. Therefore, D will match with G (“He exceeded his authority…”). This eliminates options 3 and 4.
A matches with H- overflowing of river. H is a physical phenomenon.
C matches with E; Mercy of God in E is beyond comprehension of our finite minds as mentioned in C. This eliminates option 2.
In F, exceed is used in its normal sense. B, ‘to be greater than’ links well with exceeding expectations. Therefore, B matches with F.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
For the word given at the top of each table, match the dictionary definitions on the left (A,B,C,D) with their corresponding usage on the right (E,F,G,H). Out of the four possibilities given in the boxes below the table, select the one that has all the definitions and their usages correctly matched.
Infer
Dictionary Definition | Usage | ||
A. | To derive by reasoning or implication | E. | We see smoke and infer fire. |
B. | To surmise | F. | Given some utterance, a listener may infer from it all sorts of things which neither the utterance noe the utterer implied. |
C. | To point out | G. | I waited all day to meet him. From this you, can infer my zeal to see him. |
D. | To hint | H. | She did not take part in the debate except to ask a question inferring that she was not interested in the debate. |
- A.
A-G, B-E, C-H, D-F
- B.
A-F, B-H, C-E, D-G
- C.
A-H, B-G, C-E, D-F
- D.
A-E, B-F, C-G, D-H
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
D matches with H - she did not directly say that she was not interested, but she hinted.
To surmise in B is ‘to guess’ and that matches with F - a listener may guess things which have not been implied.
‘To derive by reasoning’ mentioned in A goes with E, which states that smoke is an implication of fire.
That leaves us with C-G where ‘point out’ means ‘understand’.
Here, B-F and D-H can be ascertained to be of a greater degree and if, you got any of these right, the answer would follow.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
For the word given at the top of each table, match the dictionary definitions on the left (A,B,C,D) with their corresponding usage on the right (E,F,G,H). Out of the four possibilities given in the boxes below the table, select the one that has all the definitions and their usages correctly matched.
Mellow
Dictionary Definition | Usage | ||
A. | Adequately and properly aged so as to be free of harshness. | E. | He has mellowed with age. |
B. | Freed from rashness of youth | F. | The tones of the old violin were mellow. |
C. | Of soft and loamy consistency | G. | Some wines are mellow. |
D. | Rich and full but free from stridency | H. | Mellow soil is found in the Gangetic plains. |
- A.
A-E, B-G, C-H, D-F
- B.
A-E, B-F, C-G, D-H
- C.
A-G, B-E, C-H, D-F
- D.
A-H, B-G, C-F, D-E
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
If you are a good reader, then finding the right answer would be a piece of cake. Wines are aged to free them from harshness. You must have heard of ‘old wine’, the more it ages, the better it becomes. Therefore, A goes with G.
People become mellow with age and lose the rashness of youth. Therefore B matches with E.
Strident sound is ‘shrill or harsh’ sound. The tones of the old violin were free from stridency (was not producing harsh music). Thus, D matches with F.
C matches with H, soil is mellow or has soft or loamy consistency.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
For the word given at the top of each table, match the dictionary definitions on the left (A,B,C,D) with their corresponding usage on the right (E,F,G,H). Out of the four possibilities given in the boxes below the table, select the one that has all the definitions and their usages correctly matched.
Relief
Dictionary Definition | Usage | ||
A. | Removal or lightening of something distressing | E. | A ceremony follows the relief of a sentry after the morning shift. |
B. | Aid in the form of necessities for the indigent | F. | It was a relief to take off the tight shoes. |
C. | Diversion | G. | The only relief I get is by playing cards. |
D. | Release from the performance of duty. | H. | Disaster relief was offered to the victims. |
- A.
A-F, B-H, C-E, D-G
- B.
A-F, B-H, C-G, D-E
- C.
A-H, B-F, C-G, D-E
- D.
A-G, B-E, C-H, D-F
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
A goes with F - here, relief takes its usual meaning, removal or lightening of something distressing.
When the person takes off his tight shoes, he or she feels relieved.
‘Indigent’ means ‘poor’ or ‘poverty-stricken’. With that, the association with victims (H) becomes stronger. Victims or needy people require aid. Therefore, B matches with H.
C matches with G - the diversion is created by playing cards.
A sentry performs a duty - another strong association and that gives us the D-E match.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
For the word given at the top of each table, match the dictionary definitions on the left (A,B,C,D) with their corresponding usage on the right (E,F,G,H). Out of the four possibilities given in the boxes below the table, select the one that has all the definitions and their usages correctly matched.
Purge
Dictionary Definition | Usage | ||
A. | Remove a stigma from the name of | E. | The opposition was purged after the coup. |
B. | Make a clean sweep by removing whatever is superflows, foreign | F. | The committee heard his attempt to purge himself of a charge of heresy. |
C. | Get rid of | G. | Drugs that purge the bowels are often bad for the brain. |
D. | To cause evacuation of | H. | It is recommended to purge water by distillation. |
- A.
A-E, B-G, C-F, D-H
- B.
A-F, B-E, C-H, D-G
- C.
A-H, B-F, C-G, D-E
- D.
A-F, B-H, C-E, D-G
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
Heresy is ‘an opinion or a doctrine at variance with established beliefs’. He was charged with heresy (F) and he wanted to purge himself or remove that stigma from his name (A). Therefore, A goes with F.
If water is distilled (H), impurities or foreign matter is removed (B). Therefore, B matches with H.
After the coup (take over; remember the taking over of the government in Pakistan in a military coup by Pervez Mussharaf!), the opposition was removed (some riddance!). Therefore, C matches with E.
D goes with G because, drugs evacuate or empty or purge bowels.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentences is labelled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the four given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
- Although there are large regional variations, it is not infrequent to find a large number of people sitting here and there and doing nothing.
- Once in office, they receive friends and relatives who feel free to call any time without prior appointment.
- While working, one is struck by the slow and clumsy actions and reactions, indifferent attitudes, procedure rather than outcome orientation, and the lack of consideration for others.
- Even those who are employed often come late to the office and leave early unless they are forced to be punctual.
- Work is not intrinsically valued in India.
- Quite often people visit ailing friends and relatives or go out of their way to help them in their personal matters even during office hours.
- A.
ECADBF
- B.
EADCFB
- C.
EADBFC
- D.
ABFCBE
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
Statement E introduces the idea of work not been valued, an idea which has been exemplified in the other four statements. Therefore, E comes first. Option 4 can be eliminated.
E is followed by C as it elaborates how work is not valued. Also, C is more generic than sentences A, D and F. Therefore, EC is a more appropriate pair than EA.
DB is a pair. ‘Once in office’ of B correlates to ‘those who are employed’ in D.
F concludes the paragraph, by continuing the idea (helping friends and relatives during office hours) given in B. Therefore, BF is another mandatory pair.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentences is labelled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the four given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
- But in the industrial era destroying the enemy’s productive capacity means bombing the factories which are located in the cities.
- So in the agrarian era, if you need to destroy the enemy’s productive capacity, what you want to do is burn his fields, or if you’re really vicious, salt them.
- Now in the information era, destroying the enemy’s productive capacity means destroying the information infrastructure.
- How do you do battle with your enemy?
- The idea is to destroy the enemy’s productive capacity, and depending upon the economic foundation, that productive capacity is different in each case.
- With regard to defence, the purpose of the military is to defend the nation and be prepared to do battle with its enemy.
- A.
FDEBAC
- B.
FCABED
- C.
DEBACF
- D.
DFEBAC
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
Statement F begins the paragraph. F describes the purpose of the military and mentions that one of the purposes is to battle with the enemy. D continues this and asks how to battle your enemy. Hence, FD is a pair.
Statement E answers this question. A, B and C give the different cases of destroying the productive capacity of an enemy. Therefore, they all will come after statement E. The sequence is BAC. ‘so’ in B indicates that the statement continues after E. ‘But’ in statement A contrasts the agrarian era case.
C continues A as it brings us to the present (mentions ‘now’).
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentences is labelled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the four given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
- Michael Hofman, a poet and translator, accepts this sorry fact without approval or complaint.
- But thanklessness and impossibility do not daunt him.
- He acknowledges too in fact he returns to the point often that best translators of poetry always fail at some level.
- Hofman feels passionately about his work, and this is clear from his writings.
- In terms of the gap between worth and rewards, translators come somewhere near nurses and street cleaners.
- A.
EACDB
- B.
ADEBC
- C.
EACBD
- D.
DCEAB
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
E begins the paragraph.. The ‘sorry fact’ mentioned in A is the fact that E states - translators get little in terms of rewards although their worth is higher. Therefore, EA is a mandatory pair. That eliminates options 2 and 4.
C continues after A, ‘accepts this sorry fact’ mentioned in A and ‘acknowledges too’ mentioned in statement C.
B serves as a contrast to C, thanklessness (less in terms of rewards and worth not appreciated) and impossibility (best translators always fail) do not daunt him.
And D completes the paragraph by continuing from B - he is not daunted and works passionately.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentences is labelled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the four given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
- Passivity is not, of course, universal.
- In areas where there are no lords or laws, or in frontier zones where all men go armed, the attitude of the peasantry may well be different.
- So indeed it may be on the fringe of the un-submissive.
- However, for most of the soil-bound peasants the problem is not whether to be normally passive or active, but when to pass from one state to another.
- This depends on an assessment of the political situation.
- A.
BEDAC
- B.
CDABE
- C.
EDBAC
- D.
ABCDE
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
A begins the paragraph. B could too but B continues A.
C begins with - “so indeed” and E begins with - “this” do not follow A. B accounts for cases where passivity is not present. C adds to it - “so indeed”. Therefore, the sequence is ABC.
D changes from that theme - active or passive - and moves to another point- when to pass from one state to another.
E continues the logic - the timing depends on an assessment of the political situation.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
The sentences given in each question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentences is labelled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from among the four given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.
- The situations in which violence occurs and the nature of that violence tends to be clearly defined at least in theory, as in the proverbial Irishman’s question ‘Is this a private fight or can anyone join in?’
- So the actual risk to outsiders, though no doubt higher than our societies, is calculable.
- Probably the only uncontrolled applications of force are those of social superiors to social inferiors and even here there are probably some rules.
- However binding the obligation to kill, members of feuding families engaged in mutual massacre will be genuinely appalled if by some mischance a bystander or outsider is killed.
- A.
DABC
- B.
ACDB
- C.
CBAD
- D.
DBAC
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
A begins the passage by introducing the question of an outsider’s role in a private fight. It is followed by CD which is a mandatory pair. One of the probable rules in uncontrolled applications of force (statement C) is mentioned in D (in mutual massacre too, people do not want an outsider to be killed). Only in option 2 is the pair present. ACD is followed by sentence B which uses the keyword, ‘so’ to continue the idea from D and puts up the thought that the risk to an outsider is calculable. Therefore, the sequence is A-C-D-B.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
In each of the following sentences, parts of the sentence are left blank. Beneath each sentence, different ways of completing the sentence are indicated. Choose the best alternative among them.
But ______ are now regularly written not just for tools, but well-established practices, organisations and institutions, not all of which seem to be _____ away.
- A.
reports, withering
- B.
stories, trading
- C.
books, dying
- D.
obituaries, fading
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
For the second blank, ‘trading’ does not fit with ‘away’. We don’t use ‘trading away’. Option 2 can therefore be done away with.
Now, obituaries (published notices of death) are written for practices which die (or wither or fade in these cases). Therefore, reports and books do not fit the context. But, we don’t say that tools die. Therefore option 3 is eliminated. Yes, but the use of tools can fade away. The idea is that obituaries are written for tools, practices and organisations and not all of them seem to be fading away, that is, they are still used or practiced.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
In each of the following sentences, parts of the sentence are left blank. Beneath each sentence, different ways of completing the sentence are indicated. Choose the best alternative among them.
The Darwin who ____ is most remarkable for the way in which he ____ the attributes of the world class thinker and head of the household.
- A.
comes, figures
- B.
arises, adds
- C.
emerges, combines
- D.
appeared, combines
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
The words for the second blank ‘figures’, ‘adds’, ‘combines’ are all in present (simple) tense. The first word should also take the same tense for tense consistency in the sentence. Therefore, option 4 (the word ‘appeared’ for the first blank is in past tense in place of ‘appears’) can be ruled out.
‘Comes’ does not fit the context. Option 1 can be eliminated. ‘Combines’ is the right word for the second blank - combines the attributes required of two roles. Option 2 can also be eliminated.
‘Emerges’ is the best word of the four for the first blank from a usage perspective.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
In each of the following sentences, parts of the sentence are left blank. Beneath each sentence, different ways of completing the sentence are indicated. Choose the best alternative among them.
Since her face was free of ______ there was no way to ______ if she appreciated what had happened.
- A.
makeup, realise
- B.
expression, ascertain
- C.
emotion, diagnose
- D.
scars, understand
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
For the first blank, options 3 and 4 give the right words. If there was no way to know what she was feeling, it was her face that did not give away or did not show any emotion or expression. Make up and scars do not hide facial expressions. Thus, options 1 and 4 are eliminated.
Between ‘diagnose’ and ‘ascertain’- for the second blank, ‘ascertain’ is appropriate. It does not appear to be a problem which has to be diagnosed, rather, understand, confirm or ascertain are closer in meaning to ‘know’ if she appreciated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
In each of the following sentences, parts of the sentence are left blank. Beneath each sentence, different ways of completing the sentence are indicated. Choose the best alternative among them.
In this context, the ______ of the British labor movement is particularly ______.
- A.
affair, weird
- B.
activity, moving
- C.
experience, significant
- D.
atmosphere, gloomy
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
‘Affair’ does not fit the first blank. Therefore, we can do away with option 1.
‘Moving’ for the second blank means ‘touching’ and not ‘motion’. There is nothing specific mentioned about the activity that appears to be touching. Option 2, therefore, is ruled out.
It could be atmosphere in or within the movement rather than of. Option 4, thus is not very convincing. But, the ‘experience’ could be ‘significant’.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
In each of the following sentences, parts of the sentence are left blank. Beneath each sentence, different ways of completing the sentence are indicated. Choose the best alternative among them.
Indian intellectuals may boast, if they are so inclined, of being _____ to the most elitist among the intellectual _____of the world.
- A.
subordinate, traditions
- B.
heirs, cliques
- C.
ancestors, societies
- D.
heir, traditions
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
The statement is talking about current Indian Intellectuals. Therefore, logically, they cannot be ancestors. Option 3 can be ruled out.
If they are boasting then they would most likely not boast about being a subordinate (secondary) to someone else. Therefore, options 1 and 3 are ruled out.
Between options 2 and 4, firstly, ‘heirs’ seems better than heir (‘Indian intellectuals’ indicates plural ‘heirs’). Secondly, for the second blank, ‘cliques’ is a more apt choice. Clique also means elite (group), hence that goes with elitist among the intellectual elite.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
For each of the words below, a contextual usage is provided. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context.
Specious: A specious argument is not simply a false one but one that has the ring of truth.
- A.
Deceitful
- B.
Fallacious
- C.
Credible
- D.
Deceptive
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
It is easier to solve these questions by eliminating incorrect options. ‘Deceitful’, ‘fallacious’ and ‘deceptive’ are synonymous. Only credible is left out! A specious argument is an apparently false argument. ‘Credible’ is the opposite, it means ‘realistic’ and not apparent and therefore is the most inappropriate.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
For each of the words below, a contextual usage is provided. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context.
Obviate: The new mass transit system may obviate the need for the use of personal cars.
- A.
Prevent
- B.
Forestall
- C.
Preclude
- D.
Bolster
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
Again, ‘prevent’, ‘forestall’ and ‘preclude’ are similar in meaning. ‘Bolster’ is the opposite. It means ‘support’ or ‘strengthen’ making it the opposite of “obviate”.
“Obviate” means ‘to prevent, preclude or hinder’.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4
Workspace:
For each of the words below, a contextual usage is provided. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context.
Disuse: Some words fall into disuse as technology makes objects obsolete.
- A.
Prevalent
- B.
Discarded
- C.
Obliterated
- D.
Unfashionable
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
Something which falls into disuse can be discarded (thrown away) or destroyed (obliterated). Options 2 and 3 are eliminated (they are appropriate).
A lot of objects that become obsolete (outdated) are unfashionable. Option 4 can be done away with as well.
Something that becomes obsolete or that falls into disuse will not be prevalent (common, widespread).
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
For each of the words below, a contextual usage is provided. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context.
Parsimonious: The evidence was constructed from very parsimonious scraps of information.
- A.
Frugal
- B.
Penurious
- C.
Thrifty
- D.
Altruistic
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
Oops, the statement does not give you enough clues. If your vocabulary is good, you have little to worry though. Let us try the sentence first. If the evidence was constructed from scraps of information, we can infer that little information was available. Therefore, “parsimonious” means ‘sparing’ or ‘cost-conscious’ or ‘frugal’ or ‘thrifty’. In other words, a parsimonious chap is not willing to spend much, he is a miserly fellow.
‘Penurious’ is poor and a poor fellow cannot spare much. Therefore, options 1, 2 and 3 are eliminated.
‘Altruistic’ is the opposite of frugal - an altruistic person is giving and selfless; a philanthropist.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
For each of the words below, a contextual usage is provided. Pick the word from the alternatives given that is most inappropriate in the given context.
Facetious: When I suggested that war is a method of controlling population, my father remarked that I was being facetious.
- A.
Jovian
- B.
Jovial
- C.
Jocular
- D.
Joking
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
“Facetious” actually means ‘teasing’ and therefore comes close to mean, ‘jovial’, ‘jocular’ or ‘joking’. If you knew these 3 words or had some idea about them, you would have got the answer bang on.
The word ‘Jovian’ came from Roman mythology and it is used as an adjective. It means, “of, relating to, or resembling Jupiter.” It is inappropriate in this context.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by questions. Choose the best answer for each question.
The union government’s present position vis-a-vis the upcoming United Nations conference on racial and related discrimination world-wide seems to be the following: discuss race please, not caste; caste is our very own and not at all as bad as you think. The gross hypocrisy of that position has been lucidly underscored by Kancha llaiah. Explicitly, the world community is to be cheated out of considering the matter on the technicality that caste is not as a concept, tantamount to a racial category. Internally, however, allowing the issue to be put on agenda at the said conference would, we are patriotically admonished, damage the country’s image. Somehow, India’s virtual beliefs elbow out concrete actualities. Inverted representations, as we know, have often been deployed in human histories as balm for the forsaken– religion being the most persistent of such inversions. Yet, we would humbly submit that if globalising our markets are thought good for the ‘national’ pocket, globalising our social inequities might not be so bad for the mass of our people. After all, racism was as uniquely institutionalised in South Africa as caste discrimination has been within our society; why then can’t we permit the world community to express itself on the latter with a fraction of the zeal with which, through the years, we pronounced on the former?
As to the technicality about whether or not caste is admissible into an agenda about race (that the conference is also about ‘related discriminations’ tends to be forgotten), a reputed sociologist has recently argued that where race is a ‘biological’ category caste is a ‘social’ one. Having earlier fiercely opposed implementation of the Mandal Commission Report, the said sociologist is at least to be complemented now for admitting, however tangentially, that caste discrimination is a reality, although, in his view, incompatible with racial discrimination. One would like quickly to offer the hypothesis that biology, in important ways that affect the lives of many millions, is in itself perhaps a social construction. But let us look at the matter in another way.
If it is agreed- as per the positions today at which anthropological and allied scientific determinations rest- that the entire race of homo sapiens derived from an originally black African female (called ‘Eve’) then one is hard put to understand how, on some subsequent ground, ontological distinctions are to be drawn either between races or castes. Let us also underline the distinction between the supposition that we are all god’s children and the rather more substantiated argument about our descent from ‘Eve’, lest both positions are thought to be equally diversionary. It then stands for reason that all subsequent distinctions are, in modern parlance, ‘constructed’ ones, and, like all ideological constructions, attributable to changing equations between knowledge and power among human communities through contested histories here, there, and elsewhere.
This line of thought receives, thankfully, extremely consequential buttress from the findings of the Human Genome Project. Contrary to earlier (chiefly 19th century colonial) persuasions on the subject of race, as well as, one might add, the somewhat infamous Jensen offerings in the 20th century from America, those findings deny genetic difference between ‘races’. If anything, they suggest that environmental factors impinge on gene-function, as a dialectic seems to unfold between nature and culture. It would thus seem that ‘biology’ as the constitution of pigmentation enters the picture first only as a part of that dialectic. Taken together, the originally mother stipulation and the Genome findings ought indeed to furnish ground for human equality across the board, as well as yield policy initiatives towards equitable material dispensations aimed at building a global order where, in Hegel’s stirring formulation, only the rational constitutes the right. Such, sadly, is not the case as everyday fresh arbitrary grounds for discrimination are constructed in the interests of sectional dominance.
When the author writes “globalising our social inequities”, the reference is to
- A.
going beyond an internal deliberation on social inequity.
- B.
dealing with internal poverty through the economic benefits of globalisation.
- C.
going beyond an internal delimitation of social inequity.
- D.
achieving disadvantaged people’s empowerment, globally.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
According to the passage, caste discrimination is similar to racial discrimination. Both are social inequities. And, just as we have spoken against racial discrimination, we need to recognize that we suffer from discrimination of caste as well. Therefore, there is an internal deliberation and we need to go beyond this. It is not because of an internal (country specific) delimitation. Thus, option 3 can be done away with. The passage discusses this in the first paragraph.
Appropriately, the passage states, “why then can’t we permit the world community to express itself on the caste discrimination with a fraction of the zeal with which, through the years, we pronounced on racial discrimination?” That idea has been summed up in option 1.
Options 2 and 4 are not issues the author has dwelled upon.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
According to the author, ‘inverted representations as balm for the forsaken’
- A.
is good for the forsaken and often deployed in human histories.
- B.
is good for the forsaken, but not often deployed historically for the oppressed.
- C.
occurs often as a means of keeping people oppressed.
- D.
occurs often to invert the status quo.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
The passage is not in favour of inverted representations as can be seen from the first paragraph. Therefore options 1 and 2 can be ruled out.
According to the passage, “somehow, India’s virtual beliefs elbow out concrete actualities.” Inverted representation is a reality and is offered as a balm to abandoned or suppressed people. That brings us to option 3.
Option 4 looks like a possible answer but the author nowhere states that inverted representations invert the way things are (or the status quo). Therefore, option 4 can be ruled out.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Based on the passage, which broad areas unambiguously fall under the purview of the UN conference being discussed?
A. Racial prejudice.
B. Racial pride.
C. Discrimination, racial or otherwise.
D. Caste-related discrimination.
E. Race-related discrimination.
- A.
A, E
- B.
C, E
- C.
A, C, E
- D.
B, C, D
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
From the first paragraph, “…the upcoming United Nations conference on racial and related discrimination world-wide…” Now, the sentence fragment does not indicate all types of discrimination. ‘Related’ discrimination has not been specified by the author with reference to the UN conference. Therefore, unambiguously or clearly, A- racial prejudice and E- Race related discrimination- are definitely mentioned.
C looks very tempting, since discussion on caste has been the mainstay of this passage. However, it is not unambiguous with regards to the UN conference and therefore is ruled out.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
According to the author, the sociologist who argued that race is a ‘biological’ category and caste is a ‘social’ one;
- A.
generally shares the same orientation as the author’s on many of the central issues discussed.
- B.
tangentially admits to the existence of “caste” as a category.
- C.
admits the incompatibility between the people of different race and caste.
- D.
admits indirectly that both caste-based prejudice and racial discrimination exist.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
The author wants to point out that caste discrimination exists and that it should be accepted that it exists. The sociologist, according to the author admits, albeit tangentially that caste discrimination is a reality as mentioned in option 4.
Option 2 is incorrect as admitting caste as a category is not important.
Only once has a central issue been discussed with regards to the sociologist. Therefore option 1 can be ruled out. Further, the sociologist does not share the same orientation on different aspects on which the author agrees.
Option 3 is incorrect as the sociologist later retracts his view.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
An important message in the passage, if one accepts a dialectic between nature and culture, is that;
- A.
the results of the Human Genome Project reinforces racial differences.
- B.
race is at least partially a social construct.
- C.
discrimination is at least partially a social construct.
- D.
caste is at least partially a social construct.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
In the last paragraph, it is said that the findings of Human Genome project deny any genetic differences between ‘races’ and that it is the environment impinging on gene function. This indicates that race is not entirely a biological function and it is somewhat an environmental construct. The environment is the society in which the individual grows up. Hence, option (b) follows.
Discrimination in total- including caste has not been spoken about in this context. Therefore, options 3 and 4 are eliminated.
Option 1 is contrary to what the last paragraph says. The project does not reinforce racial differences. It denies it.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by questions. Choose the best answer for each question.
Studies of the factors governing reading development in young children have achieved a remarkable degree of consensus over the past two decades. This consensus concerns the causal role of phonological skills in young children’s reading progress. Children who have poor phonological skills, progress more poorly. In particular, those who have a specific phonological deficit are likely to be classified as dyslexic by the time that they are 9 or 10 years old.
Phonological skills in young children can be measured at a number of different levels. The term phonological awareness is a global one, and refers to a deficit in recognising smaller units of sound within spoken words. Developmental work has shown that this deficit can be at the level of syllables, of onsets and rimes, or of phonemes. For example, a 4-year old child might have difficulty in recognising that a word like valentine has three syllables, suggesting a lack of syllabic awareness. A 5 year old might have difficulty in recognising that the odd word out in the set of words fan, cat, hat, mat is fan. This task requires an awareness of the sub-syllabic units of the onset and the rime. The onset corresponds to any initial consonants is a syllable, and the rime corresponds to the vowel and to any following consonants. Rimes correspond to rhyme in single-syllable words, and so the rime in fan differs from the rime in cat, hat, and mat. In longer words, rime and rhyme may differ. The onsets in val : en : tine are /v/ and /t/, and the rimes correspond to the spelling patterns ‘al’, ‘en’, and ‘ine’.
A 6-year-old might have difficulty in recognising that plea and pray begin with the same initial sound. This is a phonemic judgement. Although the initial phoneme /p/ is shared between the two words, in plea it is part of onset ‘pl’, and in pray it is part of the onset ‘pr’. Until children can segment the onset (or the rime), such phonemic judgements are difficult for them to make. In fact, a recent survey of different developmental studies has shown that the different levels of phonological awareness appear to emerge sequentially. The awareness of syllables, onsets, and rimes appears to emerge at around the ages of 3 and 4, long before most children go to school. The awareness of phonemes, on the other hand, usually emerges at around the age of 5 or 6, when children have been taught to read for about a year. An awareness of onsets and rimes thus appears to be a precursor of reading, whereas an awareness of phonemes at every serial position in a word only appears to develop as reading is taught. The onset-rime and phonemic levels of phonological structure, however, are not distinct. Many onsets in English are single phonemes, and so are some rimes (e.g. sea, go, zoo).
The early availability of onsets and rimes is supported by studies that have compared the development of phonological awareness of onsets, rimes, and phonemes in the same subjects using the same phonological awareness tasks. For example, a study by Treiman and Zudowski used a same/different judgement task based on the beginning or the end sounds of words. In the beginning sound task, the words either began with the same onset, as in plea and plank, or shared only the initial phoneme, as in plea and pry. In the end-sound task, the words either shared the entire rime, as in spit and wit, or shared only the final phoneme, as in rat and wit. Treiman and Zudowski showed that 4–and 5–year old children found the onset-rime version of the same/different task significantly easier than the version based on phonemes. Only the 6-year-olds, who had been learning to read for about a year, were able to perform both versions of the tasks with an equal level of success.
From the following statements, pick out the true statement according to the passage:
- A.
A mono-syllabic word can have only one onset.
- B.
A mono-syllabic word can have only one rhyme but more than one rime.
- C.
A mono-syllabic word can have only one phoneme.
- D.
All of the above.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
A monosyllabic word has one syllable, and therefore, only one onset. In the example given in the passage, Val/en/tine, the onsets are /v/ and /t/.
According to the passage, a phoneme can be initial and final and therefore, there is a possibility of more than one phoneme.
With multiple rimes, the word becomes polysyllabic (the rimes in valentine are al, en and ine; 3 syllables, 3 rimes).
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
Which one of the following is likely to emerge last in the cognitive development of a child?
- A.
Rhyme
- B.
Rime
- C.
Onset
- D.
Phoneme
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
Refer to the following extract in paragraph 3, “The awareness of syllables, onsets and rimes appears to emerge at around the age of 3 or 4, long before most children go to school. The awareness of phonemes, on the other hand, usually emerges at around the age of 5 or 6, when children have been taught to read for about a year." Also, in paragraph 2, it is written that rimes correspond to rhyme in single-syllable words. Therefore, Phonemic awareness happens after rhyme, rime or onset.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
A phonological deficit in which of the following is likely to be classified as dyslexia?
- A.
Phonemic judgement
- B.
Onset judgement
- C.
Rime judgement
- D.
Any one or more of the above
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
Refer the first paragraph, where the author says, “In particular, those who have a specific phonological deficit are likely to be classified as dyslexic by the time that they are 9 or 10 years old.” The particular deficit has not been mentioned by the author. The following paragraphs depict that onset-rime precedes the development of phonemes. But, all that has been mentioned by the author to occur before the age of 9-10. Therefore, it could be any one or more of them - onset, rime or phonemic.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
The Treiman and Zudowski experiment found evidence to support the following:
- A.
at age 6, reading instruction helps children perform, both, the same-different judgement task.
- B.
the development of onset-rime awareness precedes the development of an awareness of phonemes.
- C.
at age 4-5 children find the onset-rime version of the same/different task significantly easier.
- D.
the development of onset-rime awareness is a necessary and sufficient condition for the development of an awareness of phonemes.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
Option 4 is too definite ‘…necessary and sufficient condition…’ which cannot be concluded from the passage.
In the last paragraph, the author says of the experiment, “Treiman and Zudowski showed that 4 and 5 year old children found the onset-rime version of the same/different task significantly easier than the version based on phonemes. Only the 6-year-olds, who had been learning to read for about a year, were able to perform both versions of the tasks with an equal level of success.” Therefore, option 2 supports the hypothesis that onset-rime awareness occurs earlier (easier for 4-5 year olds) than phoneme awareness (six year olds).
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
The single-syllable words Rhyme and Rime are constituted by the exact same set of
A. rime (s)
B. onset (s)
C. rhyme (s)
D. phonemes (s)
- A.
A, B
- B.
A, C
- C.
A, B, C
- D.
B, C, D
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
The mono-syllable words Rhyme and Rime clearly rhyme. Thus, C is correct. Further, both the words have the same rime, that is, the sound ‘ime’. Therefore, A is valid. B seems to be correct too, but since the question mentions the "exact same set", we cannot select B, as there is a slight sound difference between "Rh" and "R". Likewise we cannot select D.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by questions. Choose the best answer for each question.
Billie Holiday died a few weeks ago. I have been unable until now to write about her, but since she will survive many who receive longer obituaries, a short delay in one small appreciation will not harm her or us. When she died we the musicians, critics, all who were ever transfixed by the most heart-rending voice of the past generation–grieved bitterly. There was no reason to. Few people pursued self-destruction more wholeheartedly then she, and when the pursuit was at an end, at the age of forty-four, she had turned herself into a physical and artistic wreck. Some of us tried gallantly to pretend otherwise, taking comfort in the occasional moments when she still sounded like a ravaged echo of her greatness. Others had not even the heart to see and listen any more. We preferred to stay home and, if old and lucky enough to own the incomparable records of her heyday from 1937 to 1946, many of which are not even available on British LP, to recreate those coarse-textured, sinuous, and unbearable sad noises which gave her a sure corner of immortality. Her physical death called, if anything, for relief rather than sorrow. What sort of middle age would she have faced without the voice to earn money for her drinks and fixes, without the looks and in her day she was hauntingly beautiful to attract the men she needed, without business sense, without anything but the disinterested worship of ageing men had heard and seen her in her glory?
And yet, irrational though it is, our grief expressed Billie Holiday’s art, that of a woman for whom one must be sorry. The great blues singers, to whom she may be justly compared, played their game from strength. Lionesses, though often wounded or at bay (did not Bessie Smith call herself ‘a tiger, ready to jump’?), their tragic equivalents were Cleopatra and Phaedra; Holiday’s was an embittered Ophelia. She was the Puccini heroine among blues singers, or rather among jazz singers, for though she sang a cabaret version of the blues incomparably, her natural idiom was the pop song. Her unique achievement was to have twisted this into a genuine expression of the major passions by means of a total disregard of its sugary tunes, or indeed or any tune other than her own few delicately crying elongated notes, phrased like Bessie Smith or Louis Armstrong in sackcloth, song in a thin, gritty, haunting voice whose natural mood was an unresigned and voluptuous welcome for the pains of love. Nobody has sung, or will sing, Bess’s songs from Porgy as she did. It was this combination of bitterness and physical submission, as of someone lying still while watching his legs being amputated, which gives such a bloodcurdling quality to her Strange Fruit, the anti-lynching poem which she turned into an unforgettable art song. Suffering was her profession; but she did not accept it.
Little need be said about her horrifying life, which she described with emotional, though hardly with factual, truth in her autobiography Lady Sings the Blues. After an adolescence in which self-respect was measured by a girl’s insistence on picking up the coins thrown on her by clients with her hands, she was plainly beyond help. She did not lack it, for she had the flair and scrupulous honesty of John Hammond to launch her, the best musicians of the 1930s to accompany her-notably Teddy Wilson, Frankie Newton and Lester Young the boundless devotion of all serious connoisseurs, and much public success. It was too late to arrest a career of systematic embittered self-immolation. To be born with both beauty and self-respect in the Negro ghetto of Baltimore in 1915 was too much of a handicap, even without rape at the age of ten and drug-addiction in her teens. But, while she destroyed herself, she sang, unmelodious, profound and heartbreaking. It is impossible not to weep for her, or not to hate the world which made her what she was.
Why will Billie holiday survive many who receive longer obituaries?
- A.
Because of her blues creations.
- B.
Because she was not as self-destructive as some other blues exponents.
- C.
Because of her smooth and mellow voice.
- D.
Because of the expression of anger in her songs.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
Billie Holiday was actually self destructive, whether more or less than other blue singers is a matter not discussed. Option 2 can therefore be eliminated.
As the author states in paragraph one, “…to recreate those coarse-textured, sinuous, and unbearable sad noises which gave her a sure corner of immortality,” Billie’s voice was not smooth and mellow. Therefore option 3 can be ruled out.
Her songs had more than just the expression of anger, as per the passage. Therefore option 4 is eliminated.
In the second paragraph, the author says, “the great blues singers, to whom she may be justly compared, played their game from strength”. This shows that she was a great singer and would be remembered for her ‘art’ as the author puts in.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
According to the author, if Billie Holiday had not died in her middle age
- A.
she would have gone on to make a further mark.
- B.
she would have become even richer than what she was when she died.
- C.
she would have led a rather ravaged existence.
- D.
she would have led a rather comfortable existence.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
The author mentions it clearly in the first paragraph, “Her physical death called, if anything, for relief rather than sorrow. What sort of middle age would she have faced without the voice to earn money for her drinks and fixes, without the looks and in her day she was hauntingly beautiful to attract the men she needed, without business sense, without anything but the disinterested worship of ageing men had heard and seen her in her glory?”
This eliminates 1, 2 and 4 and leaves us with option 3. She would have lived a rather devastated or ravaged existence had she survived beyond middle age.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Which of the following statements is not representative of the author’s opinion?
- A.
Billie Holiday had her unique brand of melody.
- B.
Billie Holiday’s voice can be compared to other singers in certain ways.
- C.
Billie Holiday’s voice had a ring of profound sorrow.
- D.
Billie Holiday welcomed suffering in her profession and in her life.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
The following extract from paragraph 2: “She was the Puccini heroine among blues singers, or rather among jazz singers, for though she sang a cabaret version of the blues incomparably, her natural idiom was the pop song. Her unique achievement was to have twisted this into a genuine expression of the major passions by means of a total disregard of its sugary tunes, or indeed or any tune other than her own few delicately crying elongated notes, phrased like Bessie Smith or Louis Armstrong in sackcloth, song in a thin, gritty, haunting voice whose natural mood was an unresigned and voluptuous welcome for the pains of love. Nobody has sung, or will sing, Bess’s songs from Porgy as she did.” Therefore, option 1 is valid.
The following extract from paragraph 2: “The great blues singers, to whom she may be justly compared, played their game from strength.” Option 2 is valid.
As quoted above, her haunting voice whose natural mood was a welcome for the pains of love, indicated her voice had a ring of sorrow. Therefore, option 3 is valid.
The following extract from paragraph 2: “Suffering was her profession; but she did not accept it”. That shows that she did not welcome suffering or accept it.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
According to the passage, Billie Holiday was fortunate in all but one of the following ways
- A.
she was fortunate to have been picked up young by an honest producer.
- B.
she was fortunate to have the likes of Louis Armstrong and Bessie Smith accompany her.
- C.
she was fortunate to posses the looks.
- D.
she enjoyed success among the public and connoisseurs.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
In the last paragraph, the author says, “she had the flair and scrupulous honesty of John Hammond to launch her, the best musicians of the 1030s to accompany her-notably Teddy Wilson, Frankie Newton and Lester Young the boundless devotion of all serious connoisseurs, and much public success.” Therefore, options 1 and 4 are correct.
In the first paragraph, it is mentioned that, “in her day she was hauntingly beautiful.” Therefore option 3 is also correct.
Option 2 is incorrect since it has not been mentioned in the passage.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by questions. Choose the best answer for each question.
The narrative of Dersu Uzala is divided into two major sections, set in 1902 and 1907, that deal with separate expeditions which Arseniev conducts into the Ussuri region. In addition, a third time frame forms a prologue to the film. Each of the temporal frames has a different focus and by shifting them Kurosawa is able to describe the encroachment of settlements upon the wilderness and the consequent erosion of Dersu’s way of life. As the film opens, that erosion has already begun. The first image is a long shot of a huge forest, the trees piled upon one another by the effects of the telephoto lens so that the landscape becomes an abstraction and appears like a huge curtain of green. A title informs us that the year is 1910. This is as late into the century as Kurosawa will go. After this prologue, the events of the film will transpire even farther back in time and will presented as Arseniev’s recollections. The character of Dersu Uzala is the heart of the film, his life the example that Kurosawa wishes to affirm. Yet the formal organisation of the film works to contain to close, to circumscribe that life by erecting a series of obstacles around it. The film itself is circular, opening and closing by Dersu’s grave, thus sealing off the character from the modern world to which Kurosawa once so desperately wanted to speak. The multiple time frames also work to maintain a separation between Dersu and the contemporary world. We must go back farther even than 1910 to discover who he was. But this narrative structure has yet another implication. It safeguards Dersu’s example, inoculates it from contamination with history, and protects it from contact with the industrialised, urban world. Time is organised by the narrative into a series of barriers, which enclose Dersu in a kind of vacuum chamber, protecting him from the social and historical dialectics that destroyed the other Kurosawa heroes. Within the film, Dersu does die, but the narrative structure attempts to immortalise him and his example, as Dersu passes from history into myth.
We see all this at work in the enormously evocative prologue. The camera down to reveal felled trees littering the landscape and an abundance of construction. Roads and houses outline the settlement that is being built. Kurosawa cuts to a medium shot of Arseniev standing in the midst of the clearing, looking uncomfortable and disoriented. A man passing in a wagon asks him what he is done, and the explorer says he is looking for a grave. The driver replies than no one has died here, the settlement is too recent. These words enunciate the temporal rupture that the film studies. It is the beginning of things (industrial society) and the end of things (the forest), the commencement of one world so young that no one has had time yet to die and the eclipse of another, in which Dersu has died. It is his grave for which the explorer searches. His passing symbolises the new order, the development that now surrounds Arseniev. The explorer says he buried his friend three years ago, next to huge cedar and fir trees, but now they are all gone. The man on the wagon replies they were probably chopped down when the settlement was build, and he drives off. Arseniev walks to a barren, treeless spot next to a pile of bricks. As he moves, the camera tracks and pans to follow, revealing a line of freshly built houses and a woman hanging her laundry to dry. A distant train whistle is heard, and the sounds of construction in the clearing vie with the cries of birds and the rustle of wind in the trees. Arseniev pauses, looks around for the grave that once was, and murmurs desolately, “Dersu”. The image now cuts farther into the past, to 1902, and the first section of the film commences, which describes Arseniev’s meeting with Dersu and their friendship.
Kurosawa defines the world of the film initially upon a void, a missing presence. The grave is gone, brushed aside by a world rushing into modernism, and now the hunter exists only in Arseniev’s memories. The hallucinatory dreams and visions of Dodeskaden are succeeded by nostalgic, melancholy ruminations. Yet by exploring these ruminations, the film celebrates the timelessness of Dersu’s wisdom. The first section of the film has two purposes: to describe the magnificence and inhuman vastness of nature and to delineate the code of ethics by which Dersu lives and which permits him to survive in these conditions. When Dersu first appears, the other soldiers treat him with condescension and laughter, but Arseniev watches him closely and does not share their derisive response. Unlike them, he is capable of immediately grasping Dersu’s extraordinary qualities. In camp, Kurosawa frames Arseniev by himself, sitting on the other side of the fire from his soldiers. While they sleep or joke among themselves, he writes in his diary and Kurosawa cuts in several point-of-view shots from his perspective of trees that appear animated and sinister as the fire light dances across their gnarled, leafless outlines. This reflective dimension, this sensitivity to the spirituality of nature, distinguishes him from the others and forms the basis of his receptivity to Dersu and their friendship. It makes his a fit pupil for the hunter.
How is Kurosawa able to show the erosion on Dersu’s way of life?
- A.
By documenting the ebb and flow of modernisation.
- B.
By going back farther and farther in time.
- C.
By using three different time frames and shifting them.
- D.
Through his death in a distant time.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
Refer to the first paragraph, where the author says, “Each of the temporal frames has a different focus and by shifting them Kurosawa is able to describe the encroachment of settlements upon the wilderness and the consequent erosion of Dersu’s way of life.” It is the shift in the frames with which Kurosawa is able to show the erosion.
The other options are not said in this context.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Arseniev’s search for Dersu’s grave
- A.
is part of the beginning of the film.
- B.
symbolises the end of the industrial society.
- C.
is misguided since the settlement is too new.
- D.
symbolises the rediscovery of modernity.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
The author mentions that Arseniev’s search for Dersu’s grave happens in the ‘enormously evocative prologue (the opening)’. Therefore, this search is part of the beginning of the film. This resonates with option 1.
It actually symbolises the beginning of industrialisation and not the end. Therefore, option 2 can be eliminated.
Arseniev is not misguided because the settlement is new, but he is misguided because the settlement has come up and changed the landscape. Therefore, option 3 can also be eliminated.
There is nothing in the passage which mentions rediscovering modernity. Therefore, option 4 is eliminated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The film celebrates Dersu’s wisdom
- A.
by exhibiting the moral vacuum of the pre-modern world.
- B.
by turning him into a mythical figure.
- C.
through hallucinatory dreams and visions.
- D.
through Arseniev’s nostalgic, melancholy ruminations.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
The last paragraph directly gives us our answer - “The hallucinatory dreams and visions of Dodeskaden are succeeded by nostalgic, melancholy ruminations. Yet by exploring these ruminations, the film celebrates the timelessness of Dersu’s wisdom.” Option 4 thus strikes the right chord.
Option 3 is close but it is the exploration of these ruminations by which the film celebrates Dersu’s wisdom.
Options 1 and 2 can be eliminated in light of this information.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
According to the author the section of the film following the prologue
- A.
serves to highlight the difficulties that Dersu faces that eventually kills him.
- B.
shows the difference in thinking between Arseniev and Dersu.
- C.
shows the code by which Dersu lives that allows him to survive his surroundings.
- D.
serves to criticize the lack of understanding of nature in the pre-modern era.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
The passage does not been mention that the difficulties eventually killed Dersu. Therefore, option 1 can be eliminated.
The last paragraph highlights how Arseniev thinks not differently from Dersu and that he can grasp Dersu’s extraordinary qualities. Therefore, option 2 can be eliminated.
In the same paragraph, the author mentions, “The first section of the film has two purposes: to describe the magnificence and inhuman vastness of nature and to delineate the code of ethics by which Dersu lives and which permits him to survive in these conditions.” This resonates with option 3.
The same statement however is not presented to criticize the lack of understanding of nature. Thus, option 4 can be ruled out.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
In the film, Kurosawa hints at Arseniev’s reflective and sensitive nature
- A.
by showing him as not being derisive towards Dersu, unlike other soldiers.
- B.
by showing him as being aloof from other soldiers.
- C.
through shots of Arseniev writing his diary, framed by trees.
- D.
all of the above.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
Refer the last paragraph. Arseniev is sensitive as he observes Dersu and is not derisive towards him as other soldiers are. He remains on the other side of the fire and he writes in his diary. These have been mentioned by the author as - “This reflective dimension, this sensitivity to the spirituality of nature, distinguishes him from the others and forms the basis of his receptivity to Dersu and their friendship.” Therefore, options 1, 2 and 3 follow.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
According to the author, which of these statements about the film are correct?
- A.
The film makes its arguments circuitously.
- B.
The film highlights the insularity of Arseniev.
- C.
The film begins with the absence of its main protagonist.
- D.
None of the above
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
As the author says, the film is the narrative of Dersu Uzala. Refer to paragraph 2, where the author brings up the prologue or the beginning of the film. Here, Arseniev is looking for Dersu’s grave and Dersu is missing from the scene. Therefore, the main protagonist is absent in the first scene. This makes option 3 the correct answer option.
Yes, the film starts and ends with Dersu’s grave but it is not circuitous or lengthy or roundabout. Therefore option 1 can be eliminated.
Arseniev has not been portrayed by the author or the film as being insular (lonely or conservative) in outlook. Thus, option 2 can be eliminated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by questions. Choose the best answer for each question.
Democracy rests on a tension between two different principles. There is, on the one hand, the principle of equality before the law, or, more generally, of equality, and, on the other, what may be described as the leadership principle. The first gives priority to rules and the second to persons. No matter how skilfully we contrive our schemes; there is a point beyond which the one principle cannot be promoted without some sacrifice of the other.
Alexis de Tocqueville, the great nineteenth century writer on democracy, maintained that the age of democracy, whose birth he was witnessing, would also be the age of mediocrity: in saying this he was thinking primarily of a regime of equality governed by impersonal rules. Despite his strong attachment to democracy, he took great pains to point out what he believed to be its negative side: a dead level plane of achievement in practically every sphere of life. The age of democracy would, in his view, be an unheroic age; there would not be room in it for either heroes or hero-worshippers.
But modern democracies have not been able to do without heroes: this too was foreseen, with much misgiving, by Tocqueville. Tocqueville viewed this with misgiving because he believed, rightly or wrongly, that unlike in aristocratic societies there was no proper place in a democracy for heroes and, hence, when they arose they would sooner or later turn into despots. Whether they require heroes or not, democracies certainly require leaders, and, in the contemporary age, breed them in great profusion; the problem is to know what to do with them.
In a world preoccupied with scientific rationality the advantages of a system based on an impersonal rule of law should be a recommendation with everybody. There is something orderly and predictable about such a system. When life is lived mainly in small, self-contained communities, men are able to take finer personal distinctions into account in dealing with their fellow men. They are unable to do this in a large and amorphous society, and organised living would be impossible here without a system of impersonal rules. Above all, such a system guarantees a kind of equality to the extent that everybody, no matter in what station of life, is bound by the same explicit, often written, rules, and nobody is above them.
But a system governed solely by impersonal rules can at best ensure order and stability; it cannot create any shining vision of a future in which mere formal equality will be replaced by real equality and fellowship. A world governed by impersonal rules cannot easily change itself, or when it does, the change is so gradual as to make the basic and fundamental feature of society appear unchanged. For any kind of basic or fundamental change, a push is needed from within, a kind of individual initiative which will create new rules, new terms and conditions of life.
The issue of leadership thus acquires crucial significance in the context of change. If the modern age is preoccupied with scientific rationality, it is no less preoccupied with change. To accept what exists on its own terms is traditional, not modern, and it may be all very well to appreciate tradition in music, dance and drama, but for society as a whole the choice has already been made in favour of modernisation and development. Moreover, in some countries the gap between ideal and reality has become so great that the argument for development and change is now irresistible.
In these countries no argument for development has greater appeal to urgency than the one which shows development to be the condition for the mitigation, if not the elimination, of inequality. There is something contradictory about the very presence of large inequalities in a society which professes to be democratic. It does not take people too long to realise that democracy by itself can guarantee only formal equality; beyond this, it can only whet people’s appetite for real or substantive equality. From this arises their continued preoccupation with plans and schemes that will help to bridge the gap between the ideal of equality and the reality which is so contrary to it.
When pre-existing rules give no clear directions of change, leadership comes into its own. Every democracy invests its leadership with a measure of charisma, and expects from it a corresponding measure of energy and vitality. Now, the greater the urge for change in a society the stronger the appeal of a dynamic leadership in it. A dynamic leadership seeks to free itself from the constraints of existing rules; in a sense that is the test of dynamism. In this process it may take a turn at which it ceases to regard itself as being bound by these rules, placing itself above them. There is always a tension between ‘charisma’ and ‘discipline’ in the case of a democratic leadership, and when this leadership puts forward revolutionary claims, the tension tends to be resolved at the expense of discipline.
Characteristically, the legitimacy of such a leadership rests on its claim to be able to abolish or at least substantially reduce the existing inequalities in society. From the argument that formal equality or equality before the law is but a limited good, it is often one short step to the argument that it is a hindrance or an obstacle to the establishment of real or substantive equality. The conflict between a ‘progressive’ executive and a ‘conservative’ judiciary is but one aspect of this larger problem. This conflict naturally acquires added piquancy when the executive is elected and the judiciary appointed.
Dynamic leaders are needed in democracies because
- A.
they have adopted the principles of ‘formal’ equality rather than ‘substantive’ equality.
- B.
‘formal’ equality whets people’s appetite for ‘substantive’ equality.
- C.
systems that rely on the impersonal rules of ‘formal’ equality lose their ability to make large changes.
- D.
of the conflict between a ‘progressive’ executive and a ‘conservative’ judiciary.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
In the sixth paragraph, the author says, “The issue of leadership thus acquires crucial significance in the context of change.” He further says in the seventh paragraph, “It does not take people too long to realise that democracy by itself can guarantee only formal equality; beyond this, it can only whet people’s appetite for real or substantive equality.” Therefore, option 1 can be ruled out. The author continues in the eighth paragraph, “the greater the urge for change in a society the stronger the appeal of a dynamic leadership in it.” Therefore, the author stresses on the need for dynamic leadership when the need to go beyond formal equality arises, when there is a requirement to free from the constraints of existing rules and when there is requirement of large changes. Option 3 puts forth this idea.
Option 4 is a specific issue related to that idea and can be eliminated as option 3 is more appropriate.
Option 2 is close but it does not mention the ‘large changes’ which demand dynamic leadership.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
What possible factor would a dynamic leader consider a ‘hindrance’ in achieving the development goals of a nation?
- A.
Principle of equality before the law.
- B.
Judicial activism.
- C.
A conservative judiciary.
- D.
Need for discipline.
Answer: Option C
Explanation :
From paragraph eight, revolutionary claims may get the tension resolved at the expense of discipline but the need for discipline is definitely not a hindrance. Option 4 can therefore, be eliminated.
A dynamic leader is supposed to bridge the gap between equality and inequality. Therefore, the principle of equality before law is not a hindrance. Therefore, option 1 can be ruled out. Judicial activism has not been mentioned in the passage in this context. Option 2 can be eliminated.
In the last paragraph, the author mentions - “From the argument that formal equality or equality before the law is but a limited good, it is often one short step to the argument that it is a hindrance or an obstacle to the establishment of real or substantive equality. The conflict between a ‘progressive’ executive and a ‘conservative’ judiciary is but one aspect of this larger problem.” Thus, a ‘conservative judiciary’ is a hindrance.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Workspace:
Which of the following four statements can be inferred from the above passage?
A. Scientific rationality is an essential feature of modernity.
B. Scientific rationality results in the development of impersonal rules.
C. Modernisation and development have been chosen over traditional music, dance and drama.
D. Democracies aspire to achieve substantive equality.
- A.
A, B, D but not C
- B.
A, B but not C, D
- C.
A, D but not B, C
- D.
A, B, C but not D
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
As mentioned in the last few paragraphs; from formal equality, democracies aspire to achieve substantive equality. Statement D can therefore be inferred. Therefore, eliminate options 2 and 4 (where it is given that D cannot be inferred).
In paragraph 3, the author says, “In a world preoccupied with scientific rationality the advantages of a system based on an impersonal rule of law should be a recommendation with everybody.” Therefore, statements A and B can also be inferred. That eliminates option 3 leaving option 1 as the answer.
To confirm, check paragraph 6, “To accept what exists on its own terms is traditional, not modern, and it may be all very well to appreciate tradition in music, dance and drama, but for society as a whole the choice has already been made in favour of modernisation and development.” So, modernisation and development have not been chosen over traditional music, dance and drama. That makes statement C incorrect.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
Tocqueville believed that the age of democracy would be an unheroic age because
- A.
democratic principles do not encourage heroes.
- B.
there is no urgency for development in democratic countries.
- C.
heroes that emerged in democracies would become despots.
- D.
aristocratic society had a greater ability to produce heroes.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
In paragraph 3 , the author states, “Tocqueville viewed this with misgiving because he believed, rightly or wrongly, that unlike in aristocratic societies there was no proper place in a democracy for heroes”. That leads us to option 1.
Option 3 appears to be the answer but that answers the question, “what did Tocqueville have to say if heroes were produced in democracies?”
Option 1 answers our question, it is an unheroic age because democracy has no place for heroes.
Option 2 is irrelevant and out of context.
Option 1 is more apt than option 4.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
A key argument the author is making is that:
- A.
in the context of extreme inequality, the issue of leadership had limited significance
- B.
democracy is incapable of eradicating inequality.
- C.
formal equality facilitates development and change.
- D.
impersonal rules are good for avoiding instability but fall short of achieving real equality.
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
In the fifth paragraph the author says, "...a system governed solely by impersonal rules can at best ensure order and stability: it cannot create any shining vision of a future in which mere formal equality will be replaced by real equality and fellowship.” That leads us to option 4.
In all, the passage evolves from discussing formal equality to going beyond it and going for real equality. Options 1 and 2 go against the theme of the passage.
Option 3 only partially answers the question.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
Which of the following four statements can be inferred from the above passage?
A. There is conflict between the pursuit of equality and individuality.
B. The disadvantages of impersonal rules can be overcome in small communities.
C. Despite limitations, impersonal rules are essential in large systems.
D. Inspired leadership, rather than plans and schemes, is more effective in bridging inequality.
- A.
B, D but not A, C
- B.
A, B but not C, D
- C.
A, D but not B, C
- D.
A, C but not B, D
Answer: Option D
Explanation :
In paragraph 4, the author says: “When life is lived mainly in small, self-contained communities, men are able to take finer personal distinctions into account in dealing with their fellow men. They are unable to do this in a large and amorphous society, and organised living would be impossible here without a system of impersonal rules.” Impersonal rules are there to ensure equality and in smaller communities individuality thrives because personal expression can be encouraged and impersonal rules (to ensure equality) are lesser. Therefore, there is a conflict between individuality and equality. Statement A can be inferred. This eliminates option 1.
Statement C can also be inferred. The same extract puts forth the idea that impersonal rules are essential and that in large systems organized living would be impossible without impersonal rules. That leaves us with option 4 as the answer.
But, let us check statements B and D as well. Statement B, is a slightly flawed representation – the same sentence says that finer personal distinctions can be taken into account by men in smaller communities than larger communities where impersonal rules have to be present. But the statement does not say that smaller communities need to have impersonal rules. In fact it implies that smaller communities may be able to get by without too many impersonal rules. Therefore, B cannot be inferred.
Statement D is a very tempting argument. Let us look at the statement where the author speaks about plans and schemes to achieve substantive equality - “It does not take people too long to realise that democracy by itself can guarantee only formal equality; beyond this, it can only whet people’s appetite for real or substantive equality. From this arises their continued preoccupation with plans and schemes that will help to bridge the gap between the ideal of equality and the reality which is so contrary to it. When pre-existing rules give no clear directions of change, leadership comes into its own.” So, yes, as the author points out that leadership and that too inspired leadership may help in bridging inequality, the author does not say that plans and schemes are entirely useless. In light of all these, A and C can be directly inferred.
Hence, the correct answer is option 4.
Workspace:
The passage given below is followed by questions. Choose the best answer for each question.
In the modern scientific story, light was created not once but twice. The first time was in the Big Bang, when the universe began its existence as a glowing, expanding, fireball, which cooled off into darkness after a few million years. The second time was hundreds of millions of years later, when the cold material condensed into dense nuggets under the influence of gravity, and ignited to become the first stars.
Sir Martin Rees, Britain’s astronomer royal, named the long interval between these two enlightenments the cosmic “Dark Age”. The name describes not only the poorly lit conditions, but also the ignorance of astronomers about that period. Nobody knows exactly when the first stars formed, or how they organised themselves into galaxies-or even whether stars were the first luminous objects. They may have been preceded by quasars, which are mysterious, bright spots found at the centres of some galaxies.
Now, two independent groups of astronomers, one led by Robert Becker of the University of California, Davis, and the other by George Djorgovski of Caltech, claim to have peered far enough into space with their telescopes (and therefore backwards enough in time) to observe the closing days of the Dark Age.
The main problem that plagued previous efforts to study the Dark Age was not the lack of suitable telescopes, but rather the lack of suitable things at which to point them. Because these events took place over 13 billion years ago, if astronomers are to have any hope of unravelling them they must study objects that are at least 13 billion light years away. The best prospects are quasars, because they are so bright and compact that they can be seen across vast stretches of space. The energy source that powers a quasar is unknown, although it is suspected to be the intense gravity of a giant black hole. However, at the distances required for the study of Dark Age, even quasars are extremely rare and faint.
Recently some members of Dr. Becker’s team announced their discovery of the four most distant quasars known. All the new quasars are terribly faint, a challenge that both teams overcome by peering at them through one of the twin Keck telescopes in Hawaii. These are the world’s largest, and can therefore collect the most light. The new work by Dr. Becker’s team analysed the light from all four quasars. Three of them appeared to be similar to ordinary, less distant quasars. However, the fourth and most distant, unlike any other quasar ever seen, showed unmistakable signs of being shrouded in a fog of hydrogen gas. This gas is leftover material from the Big Bang that did not condense into stars or quasars. It acts like fog because new-born stars and quasars emit mainly ultraviolet light, and hydrogen gas is opaque to ultraviolet. Seeing this fog had been the goal of would-be Dark Age astronomers since 1965, when James Gunn and Bruce Peterson spelled out the technique for using quasars as backlighting beacons to observe the fog’s ultraviolet shadow.
The fog prolonged the period of darkness until the heat from the first stars and quasars had the chance to ionise the hydrogen (breaking it into its constituent parts, protons and electrons). Ionised hydrogen is transparent to ultraviolet radiation, so at that moment the fog lifted and the universe became the well-lit place it is today. For this reason, the end of the Dark Age is called the “Epoch of Re-ionisation”. Because the ultraviolet shadow is visible only in the most distant of four quasars, Dr. Becker’s team concluded that the fog had dissipated completely by the time the universe was about 900 million years old, and one-seventh of its current size.
In the passage, the Dark Age refers to:
- A.
the period when the universe became cold after the Big Bang.
- B.
a period about which astronomers know very little.
- C.
the medieval period when cultural activity seemed to have come to an end.
- D.
the time that the universe took to heat up after the Big Bang.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
Option 1 indicates the period before the Dark Age.
Option 3 is irrelevant in the present context.
Option 4, is not correct as nothing has been said about the universe heating up after the Big Bang.
In the second paragraph, the author says that the period is called the Dark Age because of two reasons. One, that the universe was poorly lit and the other that very little about that period is known to the astronomers. Therefore, option 2 conforms to the second reason.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
Astronomers find it difficult to study the Dark Age because:
- A.
suitable telescopes are few.
- B.
the associated events took place aeons ago.
- C.
the energy source that powers a quasar is unknown.
- D.
their best chance is to study quasars, which are faint object to begin with.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
Option 1 can be easily ruled out, as the author says, “not because of the lack of suitable telescopes, but rather the lack of suitable things at which to point at.”
Option 3 is also ruled out as that is not the reason for the difficulty. The author further says, “Because these events took place over 13 billion years ago, if astronomers are to have any hope of unravelling them they must study objects that are at least 13 billion light years away.” That points to option 2, which indicates that the events are extremely old.
Option 4 comes close as the author further discusses quasars and mentions the difficulty in locating and studying them, as they are far off. But in light of the information given- that the event is a very old one- option 2 is more appropriate.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
The four most distant quasars discovered recently
- A.
could only be seen with the help of large telescopes.
- B.
appear to be similar to other ordinary, quasars.
- C.
appear to be shrouded in a fog of hydrogen gas.
- D.
have been sought to be discovered by Dark Age astronomers since 1965.
Answer: Option A
Explanation :
According to the fifth paragraph, the fourth and the most distant quasar is different from ordinary quasars and unlike the other quasars is shrouded in hydrogen gas. The other quasars are not shrouded in hydrogen gas. That rules out options 2 and 3.
Astronomers have been looking at the fog around the quasars since 1965 and not the quasar. Therefore, option 4 is eliminated.
The author mentions the telescopes and says, “The twin Keck telescopes in Hawaii are the world’s largest, and can therefore collect the most light.” Since distant quasars are faint, it is implied that big, powerful, telescopes would be required to spot them.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.
Workspace:
The fog of hydrogen gas seen through the telescopes
- A.
is transparent to hydrogen radiation from stars and quasars in all states.
- B.
was lifted after heat from stars and quasars ionised it.
- C.
is material which eventually became stars and quasars.
- D.
is broken into constituent elements when stars and quasars are formed.
Answer: Option B
Explanation :
From the last paragraph - “The fog prolonged the period of darkness until the heat from the first stars and quasars had the chance to ionise the hydrogen (breaking it into its constituent parts, protons and electrons). Ionised hydrogen is transparent to ultraviolet radiation.” That makes option 2 our correct answer option.
Option 1can be eliminated as it is not ‘hydrogen’ radiation.
In the fifth paragraph, the author writes that hydrogen gas was left over material that did not condense into stars or quasars. Therefore, option 3 is ruled out.
Further, the fog of hydrogen gas was broken into protons and electrons and not into constituent elements. Thus, option 4, too is eliminated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Workspace:
Feedback
Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.